Re: [OSM-talk-be] D1 road sign

2013-03-10 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
On 2013-02-11 18:06, Ben Laenen wrote : On Monday 11 February 2013 02:19:31 A.Pirard.Papou wrote: What you are showing here is a Ministeriƫle omzendbrieven ... It's a text that must be not be read by the drivers but by the persons who place the signals.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] D1 road sign

2013-02-11 Thread Ben Laenen
On Monday 11 February 2013 02:19:31 A.Pirard.Papou wrote: > What you are showing here is a Ministeriƫle omzendbrieven > M.O. 30-10-1998 > > ** > It's a text that must be not be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] D1 road sign

2013-02-10 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
On 2013-01-18 00:38, Ben Laenen wrote : On Friday 18 January 2013 00:07:19 A.Pirard.Papou wrote: I did not say that your translation is bad and I don't blame you, I meant that the explanation in the Belgian highway code is bad. *Actually*, this sign

Re: [OSM-talk-be] D1 road sign

2013-01-17 Thread Ben Laenen
On Friday 18 January 2013 00:07:19 A.Pirard.Papou wrote: > I did not say that your translation is bad and I don't blame you, I > meant that the explanation in the Belgian highway code is bad. > *Actually*, this sign > g>

Re: [OSM-talk-be] D1 road sign

2013-01-17 Thread A.Pirard.Papou
On 2013-01-16 22:32, Ben Laenen wrote : On Wednesday 16 January 2013 22:04:57 A.Pirard.Papou wrote: Hi, The "Mandatory to follow the direction indicated by the arrow" description for the down sloping D1 signals here is (fortunately) inc