Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

s including tunneled sections to it, and hey presto: that someone has overridden the override. Don't blame the renderer for bad tagging. You can certainly blame it for lots of things, but not that. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-

Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

? -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Hatfield Tunnel not appearing as a tunnel

n the non-tunnel motorway relation is rendered on top of that. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Things that aren't stations tagged railway=station

ing special to their import stages. Using a key suffix (railway:disused=*) would mean extra work. Granted, as a maintainer of a few maps, I'm biased. I just detest those negating tags. "This is a $shazbaz. Oh, no, it isn't!" -- Lennard _

Re: [Talk-GB] Visualising speed limits

On 29-10-2010 22:22, thomas van der veen wrote: Has someone actually done something like this already? http://maxspeed.openstreetmap.nl/ However, it doesn't cover the UK, and I never had the need to support mph. But those criteria weren't part of your question. :-)

Re: [Talk-GB] Relations

me makes all the more sense, instead of this whole "tagging for the editor" business. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Relations

hat is unique to each relation. boundary=administrative + admin_level= Oh, and please consider the use of type=multipolygon relations for these boundaries, and not the superfluous type=boundary variant. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openst

Re: [Talk-GB] What has happened to Relation 2204 (ncn 4)?

2561, latest is way past that. Hopefully a lot of the old cruft will go once they release a new tested version shortly. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Underground Pipelines

I've actually seen waterways tagged with oneway: http://osm.org/go/0EqnaoNLM- -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Underground Pipelines

way with the oneway=yes tag, and that could probably be limited to highway/railway/waterway=* without serious impact to the map. Speak up if you think this is a bad idea, else this change can go in soon. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Why has City Hall sunk?

/ticket/1873 http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/1971 -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] NAPTAN pay_scale_area

des your example, that shouldn't be on the map (or not in the way they appear). Issue is, if we just remove the Else rules, other stuff could drop, that actually should still be rendered. So we need specific rules for those, after we identify them. Do they show in osmarender? -- Lennard

Re: [Talk-GB] liam123's latest

ets commented* with 'de-liam123isation', but upon closer inspection I think it reverted all liam123's changes. I thought earlier that he only reverted a few of the changes, which prompted my remark. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/25

Re: [Talk-GB] liam123's latest

t currently prevents a clean revert of his latest changesets. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] liam123's latest

t doesn't get to that, because I'd rather not clean up for 3 months without hints that he/she can/will be stopped by the DWG. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] liam123

fied it twice, the script will now cope and undo it only once. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Aerial Photography

olume: 600MB per exposure, 17310 x 11310 pixels Orthorectified photography: Data volume: 300MB/km^2 uncompressed [1] <http://www.cyclomedia.nl/File/File/Specsheet%20LuchtfotoNL%202009.pdf> -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@open

Re: [Talk-GB] Just got this big apology from Gothy about the dodgy edit in Stratford

ed, asked very specifically if you wanted to be playing around to test, or be serious and edit. The current Edit with save vs Edit live modes make no real sense to a beginner, not in the way the old dialog conveyed that meaning. -- Lennard _

Re: [Talk-GB] Just got this big apology from Gothy about the dodgy edit in Stratford

ert scripts plainly refuse them at this time. PS: Changeset 2329425 seems to still be a clean revert at this point. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-transit] Roundabout, ways and relationship policies

most all roads have been segmented, so they run from junction to junction. Also, all roundabouts were modeled as consisting of separate segments between each connecting road. So, even the pros are modeling it in this split way. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB m

Re: [Talk-GB] Roundabout, ways and relationship policies

* part of the route. -- Lennard ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb