I was thinking along the lines:
A WM(T)S base map of overlayed/consolidated inspire/ordnance survey, not
revealing any of the postcodes and internal ids
ianal but imho that would not violate any of the licences
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 20:35, SK53 wrote:
> It's always been useless to us. However t
It's always been useless to us. However the terms have changed since the
original release (basically IIRC to make the restrictions more explicit).
Jerry
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 19:48, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB <
talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Is
> "Although the data is released under the
Is
"Although the data is released under the OGL, there is an
important caveat: third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised
to license"
is still applicable what makes it basically useless for us?
May 16, 2020, 16:47 by christian.lederm...@gmail.com:
> Reading through the inspi
INSPIRE polygons have never been suitable for use in OSM.
Both Chris Hill and I wrote blog posts at the time:
-
https://sk53-osm.blogspot.com/2013/10/not-very-inspired-land-registry-open.html
-
http://chris-osm.blogspot.com/2013/10/land-registry-inspire-polygons.html
Jerry
On
In what way do you think the Land Registry licence has been adjusted? That
wording has been in place for some time.
It is possible Land Registry will change their licence in July, as Ordnance
Survey are changing the terms under which public sector organisations can
share their derived data in prop
Reading through the inspire land registry data, it seems they have adjusted
their licence:
What would that mean for use in OSM?
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/inspire-index-polygons-spatial-data#conditions-of-use
Conditions of use
Your use of the INSPIRE Index Polygons service is governed by condit
6 matches
Mail list logo