> i'd say that anything serving as an undivided collector (one step up from
> a residential/unclassified) is good as tertiary
>
I agree with that. For me nothing is worse than find myself driving in an
unfamiliar town where all roads but primaries are mapped as residentials so
there is no way to c
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:37 AM, James Mast wrote:
> Well, it seems "Changeset: 16397959" is legit (minus the missing changeset
> comment) since I-269 IS under-construction in that area, well, at least on
> the MS side for sure.
>
> http://www.desototimes.com/articles/2013/03/23/news/doc514cf7ea1d8
Well, it seems "Changeset: 16397959" is legit (minus the missing changeset
comment) since I-269 IS under-construction in that area, well, at least on the
MS side for sure.
http://www.desototimes.com/articles/2013/03/23/news/doc514cf7ea1d8d0663837988.txt
-James
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> We lost track of this case when Richard Weait stepped down, but I placed a
> 0-hour block about the complaints and pointing out that changeset comments
> are helpful.
>
> ** **
>
> The 0-hour block has expired so Cam4rd98 has read it, but
4 matches
Mail list logo
