Re: 5.3.2.10

2012-11-13 Thread Tony Hoare
Hello Maxim, > The Bat! 5.3.2.10 (BETA) is available at > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb53210.rar > What's new in 5.3.2.10 since 5.3.2.9: > [*] The "Mark replied messages as read automatically" option is on by default > (for new accounts) > [*] Warning is now given when ano

Re: Some Incredimail emails do not display the font correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Rick
>It seems the fonts are not rendered correctly nor are they substituted. The >mail reads correctly in the text viewer. File attached in bug tracker >https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=122 And before someone else says it YES Incredimail is a piece of crap. However it has a following and the

Some Incredimail emails do not display the font correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Rick
It seems the fonts are not rendered correctly nor are they substituted. The mail reads correctly in the text viewer. File attached in bug tracker https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=122 -- Rick If you can dream it, you can do it. - Walt Disney v5.3.2.10 (BETA) on Windows XP 5.1 Build 260

Re: 5.3.2.10

2012-11-13 Thread Rick
>[*] Warning is now given when another message is selected when Quick Reply >text is not empty (Beta issue) Wow - good job! -- Rick Nothing is more admirable than the fortitude with which millionaires tolerate the disadvantages of their wealth. - Rex Stout v5.3.2.10 (BETA) on Windows XP 5.1

Re: 5.3.2.10

2012-11-13 Thread Ethan J Mings
>What's new in 5.3.2.10 since 5.3.2.9: [*] The "Mark replied messages as read >automatically" option is on by default (for new accounts) [*] Warning is now >given when another message is selected when Quick Reply text is not empty >(Beta issue) Ok, it loaded just fine. Jerry -- Ethan J Min

5.3.2.10

2012-11-13 Thread Maxim Masiutin
The Bat! 5.3.2.10 (BETA) is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/a-5/tb53210.rar What's new in 5.3.2.10 since 5.3.2.9: [*] The "Mark replied messages as read automatically" option is on by default (for new accounts) [*] Warning is now given when another message is selected

Re: Source View: Message-ID sometimes to colored correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Ivan Pozdeev
> It probably comes from older RFC822 which says that Message-ID is addr-spec > surrounded by <>. https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=121 Whether they will pay attention to this sometime of not, let it be there. -- Best regards, Ivanmailto:v...@mail.mipt.ru 5.3.

RE: Source View: Message-ID sometimes to colored correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Vilius Šumskas
> >> Hello Vilius, > >> >> Message-ID: >> >> 1352796933847@3capp-webde-bs49> > >> > >> > That's because it is invalid ID. It doesn't conform to RFC822 > >> > specification. > >> > >> You probably wouldn't volunteer to elaborate as to exactly what is wrong > >> with it right away > >> without bein

Re: Source View: Message-ID sometimes to colored correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Ivan Pozdeev
>> Hello Vilius, >> >> Message-ID: > >> 1352796933847@3capp-webde-bs49> >> >> > That's because it is invalid ID. It doesn't conform to RFC822 >> > specification. >> >> You probably wouldn't volunteer to elaborate as to exactly what is wrong >> with it right away >> without being asked explicitly

Re: Source View: Message-ID sometimes to colored correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Ivan Pozdeev
> Hello Vilius, >>> Message-ID: >> 1352796933847@3capp-webde-bs49> >> That's because it is invalid ID. It doesn't conform to RFC822 specification. > You probably wouldn't volunteer to elaborate as to exactly what is wrong with > it right away > without being asked explicitly? :) I'd like to hea

RE: Source View: Message-ID sometimes to colored correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Vilius Šumskas
> Hello Vilius, > >> Message-ID: >> 1352796933847@3capp-webde-bs49> > > > That's because it is invalid ID. It doesn't conform to RFC822 specification. > > You probably wouldn't volunteer to elaborate as to exactly what is wrong > with it right away > without being asked explicitly? :) Message-I

Re: Source View: Message-ID sometimes to colored correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Viktor Kabelac
Hello Vilius, >> Message-ID: > 1352796933847@3capp-webde-bs49> > That's because it is invalid ID. It doesn't conform to RFC822 specification. You probably wouldn't volunteer to elaborate as to exactly what is wrong with it right away without being asked explicitly? :) -- Best regards, Viktor

RE: Source View: Message-ID sometimes to colored correctly

2012-11-13 Thread Vilius Šumskas
> Hello mse, > > m> since Version 5.3.2.2 it is possible to assign a special color to the > m> contents (address) of the Message-ID-header. > m> However, it seems that sometimes this header is not correctly recognized > m> and thus colored in the assigned color. > > m> These are examples of Messa

Re: Source View: Message-ID sometimes to colored correctly

2012-11-13 Thread mse
Hello mse, m> since Version 5.3.2.2 it is possible to assign a special color to the m> contents (address) of the Message-ID-header. m> However, it seems that sometimes this header is not correctly recognized m> and thus colored in the assigned color. m> These are examples of Message-IDs that ar