Re: [3.0.9.11] S/MIME broken

2005-03-31 Thread Peter Hampf
Hello Frank, on Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:46:04 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote: FL> In 3.0.9.11 my Certificate for S/MIME is suddenly invalid. After going FL> back tu 3.0.9.10 it work´s fine !! Maybe it is an issue related to ? -- Regards, Peter Using Ritlabs TheBat! 3.0.9.10 Return (OS: W

[3.0.9.11] S/MIME broken

2005-03-31 Thread Frank Lahrmann
Hello tbbeta, In 3.0.9.11 my Certificate for S/MIME is suddenly invalid. After going back tu 3.0.9.10 it work´s fine !! any confirmations ? -- Adios, Frank Current beta is 3.0.9.10 Return | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.sil

Re: S/MIME Broken?

2004-07-16 Thread Thomas Woelk
* Maxim Masiutin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You have turned on "Compress data before encryption" which is off by > default. It conforms to rfc3274, but is not yet supported by a > majority of S/MIME clients. > Should we give an additional "warning" message box if the user turns > on this optio

Re: S/MIME Broken?

2004-07-16 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Kevin, Thursday, July 15, 2004, 19:50:13, you wrote: >>I don't use s/mime that often but attempted to exchange encrypted >>mails with some Thunderbird and Mozilla recipients. I am able to >>decrypt their messages. They can verify my signed mail. However, none >>of them are able to decrypt m

Re: S/MIME Broken?

2004-07-15 Thread Maxim Masiutin
e >>of them are able to decrypt my encrypted messages. >>I've tried using both the internal implementation and the MS >>CryptoAPI without success. Is there some settings I can change to >>facilitate success or is encryption broken? 1. Send me an empty email to [EMAIL PROTEC