Re: Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.

2005-09-22 Thread Luca
Roelof Otten: > Hallo Luca, > L> %TO="" > L> %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > L> This creates a reply with no "To:" field. AFAIK, TB is not supposed to do > L> that. > You could try to drop both %To= macros and replace them with > %SetHeader("To","[EMAIL PROTECTED]") It works for me, even with

Mod: Untrimmed reply (was: Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.)

2005-09-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Oto, On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:03:23 +0200GMT (22-9-2005, 15:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> >> Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: >> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html >> OZ> __

Mod: Top posting (was: Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.)

2005-09-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Oto, On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:03:23 +0200GMT (22-9-2005, 15:03 +0200, where I live), you wrote: OZ> "Create new MSG", not "Create automatic reply". OZ> -- OZ> OttY OZ> 2005/9/22, Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the pers

Re: Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.

2005-09-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Luca, On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:26:29 +0200GMT (22-9-2005, 14:26 +0200, where I live), you wrote: L> I'm trying to set a reply template in a "create automatic reply" filter, with L> these two instructions: L> %TO="" L> %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" L> This creates a reply with no "To:" field.

Re: Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.

2005-09-22 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello Luca, > I think the above example is valid, and it seems to show a bug in TB. > Can anyone confirm? confirmed with "create automatic reply" filter. With a normal reply template it work as expected. -- Best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker: http://theba

Re: Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.

2005-09-22 Thread Oto Ziak
IMHO, it is not TB bug. Reply is reply to original address and you can't erase it from new header. You can you "create new msg" and place into msg body original body transformed by regexp. It is only my idea. -- OttY 2005/9/22, Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I think the above example is valid, an

Re: Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.

2005-09-22 Thread Luca
Oto Ziak: > 2005/9/22, Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'm trying to set a reply template in a "create automatic reply" filter, > > with > > these two instructions: > > > > %TO="" > > %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > This creates a reply with no "To:" field. AFAIK, TB is not supposed to do > > that.

Re: Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.

2005-09-22 Thread Oto Ziak
"Create new MSG", not "Create automatic reply". -- OttY 2005/9/22, Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to set a reply template in a "create automatic reply" filter, with > these two instructions: > > %TO="" > %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > This creates a reply with no "To:" field

Problems with "%TO:" macro in a reply template.

2005-09-22 Thread Luca
Hi all, I'm trying to set a reply template in a "create automatic reply" filter, with these two instructions: %TO="" %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" This creates a reply with no "To:" field. AFAIK, TB is not supposed to do that. If my reply template contains just %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" it cre