On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:13:04PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> Try msi and fallback to old intr mapping. Works on my box where the
> ahci is on a non-msi bus.
Works on my X60 which has ahci on an msi bus:
luggage$ dmesg | grep ^ahci
ahci0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 "Intel 82801GBM AHCI" r
Hi,
Recently it came to my attention that date(1) on solaris
doesn't quite work the way I expected it to. Specifically,
the result of `date +%s' was unexpected.
I soon came to the realization that OpenBSD's man page for
date(1) lies a bit about POSIX compliance and omits the
+format conversion sp
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:13:04PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
| Try msi and fallback to old intr mapping. Works on my box where the
| ahci is on a non-msi bus.
I have the exact same 82801GBM controller as mk in a Lenovo Z61m.
Works fine here too, the dmesg line shows 'msi' and I've not not
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:13:04 -0400
> From: Kenneth R Westerback
>
> Try msi and fallback to old intr mapping. Works on my box where the
> ahci is on a non-msi bus.
In other words; ou didn't really test this ;)
> ok?
No. I've looked at the Linux code, and their code suggests there are
some
Conozca como la Nueva Red Social Mercosur.com puede trabajar para Ud
Hi,
Removing unused code:
* arch/mac68k/include/keyboard.h not used in kernel sources
* not need define KEYBOARD_ARRAY (variable keyboard[] used only in
dev/adb/akbd.c if defined WSDISPLAY_COMPAT_RAWKBD)
OK ?
--
Alexandr Shadchin
Index: arch/mac68k/include/keyboard.h
Any objections to adding this to the LIST structure?
I needed this a bounch of times and I think it makes sense in a *doubly*
linked list.
Index: sys/sys/queue.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/queue.h,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Paul Irofti wrote:
> Any objections to adding this to the LIST structure?
Yes, because it doesn't work.
If you want that, just change it from a LIST to a TAILQ.
Philip Guenther
In the spirit of trying to enable MSI for various devices, who wants
to play with bge(4)?
bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5761" rev 0x10, BCM5761 A1
(0x5761100): msi, address 00:10:18:4b:23:b4
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5761 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
Works for me so far.
Index: if
I enabled MSI for the wpi(4) in my X60:
wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG" rev 0x02: msi, MoW2,
address 00:13:02:9b:f4:89
It didn't blow up right away. Anyone else feel lucky?
Index: if_wpi.c
===
RCS file:
- Original message -
> In the spirit of trying to enable MSI for various devices, who wants
> to play with bge(4)?
>
> bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5761" rev 0x10, BCM5761 A1
> (0x5761100): msi, address 00:10:18:4b:23:b4 brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1:
> BCM5761 10/100/1000baseT PHY,
> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:25:23 +0200
> From: Michael Knudsen
>
> I enabled MSI for the wpi(4) in my X60:
>
> wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG" rev 0x02: msi,
> MoW2, address 00:13:02:9b:f4:89
>
> It didn't blow up right away. Anyone else feel lucky?
Reasonably conf
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Michael Knudsen wrote:
| I enabled MSI for the wpi(4) in my X60:
|
| wpi0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG" rev 0x02: msi,
MoW2, address 00:13:02:9b:f4:89
|
| It didn't blow up right away. Anyone else feel lucky?
Seems like my Z61m
> From: Brad
> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:29:52 -0400
>
> - Original message -
> > In the spirit of trying to enable MSI for various devices, who wants
> > to play with bge(4)?
> >
> > bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5761" rev 0x10, BCM5761 A1
> > (0x5761100): msi, address 00:1
Been running with this for a couple of weeks, seems to work fine.
ok?
diff --git dev/pci/if_iwn.c dev/pci/if_iwn.c
index 16765f4..a54556b 100644
--- dev/pci/if_iwn.c
+++ dev/pci/if_iwn.c
@@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ iwn_attach(struct device *parent, struct device *self, void
*aux)
}
/*
> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:49:43 +0100
> From: Owain Ainsworth
>
> Been running with this for a couple of weeks, seems to work fine.
>
> ok?
>
> diff --git dev/pci/if_iwn.c dev/pci/if_iwn.c
> index 16765f4..a54556b 100644
> --- dev/pci/if_iwn.c
> +++ dev/pci/if_iwn.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ iwn_a
2 usersLoad 0.09 0.09 0.08 Thu Jun 2 20:12:59 2011
DEVICE READWRITE RTPS WTPS SECSTATS
sd0 0000 0.0 588656
numbufs
sd1 0000
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 10:49:43PM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> Been running with this for a couple of weeks, seems to work fine.
>
> ok?
>
> diff --git dev/pci/if_iwn.c dev/pci/if_iwn.c
> index 16765f4..a54556b 100644
> --- dev/pci/if_iwn.c
> +++ dev/pci/if_iwn.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ iwn_att
18 matches
Mail list logo