Re: ssl certificate chains (in relayd)

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/03/21 20:51, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/03/21 15:38, Todd T. Fries wrote: > > Separately, I'd also love to be able to specify the certificate by name > > per relay, as sometimes a given relayd instance might receive redirected > > traffic for multiple external addresses. Sure, with

Re: ssl certificate chains (in relayd)

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/03/21 15:38, Todd T. Fries wrote: > Separately, I'd also love to be able to specify the certificate by name > per relay, as sometimes a given relayd instance might receive redirected > traffic for multiple external addresses. Sure, with RFC1918 one can > assign multiple addresses to the re

Re: ssl certificate chains (in relayd)

2012-03-21 Thread Todd T. Fries
Penned by Sebastian Benoit on 20120321 15:27.54, we have: | Hi, | | i did not find a place where it is documented explicitly how to use a | certificate chain with relayd. | | Should this be documented? Or maybe in ssl(8)? | | /Benno | | Index: relayd.conf.5

ssl certificate chains (in relayd)

2012-03-21 Thread Sebastian Benoit
Hi, i did not find a place where it is documented explicitly how to use a certificate chain with relayd. Should this be documented? Or maybe in ssl(8)? /Benno Index: relayd.conf.5 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayd/relayd.conf.

Re: KERNEL MODIFICATION in config(8)

2012-03-21 Thread Ted Unangst
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote: > The kernel is too old (pre OpenBSD 2.6) and cannot support all of the > functionality needed by the -e option. > Isn't that OpenBSD 2.6-beta pmap arch config example somewhat exotic and > outdated? So about "too old pre OpenBSD 2.6 kernel" comment

KERNEL MODIFICATION in config(8)

2012-03-21 Thread Alexey E. Suslikov
Hello tech@. In KERNEL MODIFICATION section: ... When invoked, the kernel identification is first shown. # config -e -o bsd.new /bsd OpenBSD 2.6-beta (GENERIC.rz0) #0: Mon Oct 4 03:57:22 MEST 1999 root@winona:/usr/src/sys/arch/pmax/compile/GENERIC.rz0

Re: random() always returns 0 with srandom(0)

2012-03-21 Thread Paul de Weerd
Hi Jeremy, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:37:47PM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: | My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on | multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw | that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG, random() will alway

Re: random() always returns 0 with srandom(0)

2012-03-21 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:37:47PM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on > multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw > that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG, random() will always > return

Re: random() always returns 0 with srandom(0)

2012-03-21 Thread Brad Smith
On 21/03/12 1:37 PM, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG, random() will always return 0. (I was able to reproduce t

Re: random() always returns 0 with srandom(0)

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/03/21 17:41, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2012/03/21 12:37, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > > My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on > > multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw > > that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG,

Re: random() always returns 0 with srandom(0)

2012-03-21 Thread Theo de Raadt
> My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on > multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw > that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG, random() will always > return 0. (I was able to reproduce this.) > > If this is expected beh

Re: random() always returns 0 with srandom(0)

2012-03-21 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2012/03/21 12:37, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on > multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw > that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG, random() will always > return 0. (I was able to re

random() always returns 0 with srandom(0)

2012-03-21 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
My co-worker was troubleshooting why some of our unittests (that work on multiple operating systems and architectures) failed on OpenBSD and saw that if you call srandom(0) to initialize the RNG, random() will always return 0. (I was able to reproduce this.) If this is expected behaviour, plea

Vinos exclusivos a precio de IMPORTADOR OFERTA. publicidad ti bin

2012-03-21 Thread Verano Exclusivo
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of tazararse.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of dmedianista.jpg] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of tbonicamente.jpg]

hi,there#

2012-03-21 Thread esoykan
hi,there tech i bought an ipad 3 from this site, the price is good, tech the site also sell other kinds electronincs,computer,digital camera,iphone... tech the shipping is free, maybe it is a good chance for you tech si t e : urs.com 23:10:41

Re: Cleaned up posix_spawn() diff

2012-03-21 Thread Mark Kettenis
Hi Matthew, Can we avoid things like "pid_t * __restrict" and "char * const" please? Many brains parse the "*" as a multiplication operator when it is surrounded by spaces on either side. Even the POSIX standard used the "pid_t *restrict" and "char *const" style. Thanks, Mark