Anyone? I have received no feedback on this.
I'd really like to get review because fixing IPv6CP has
turned out to be tricker than I expected.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:32:03PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Our IPv6CP implementation has never handled IFID collisions. The old
code (from before
Use the dedicated BCD macros from sys/time.h instead of handrolling
our own for the m41t8x clocks.
Runs fine on my Lemote.
Is this okay?
Index: m41t8xclock.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/loongson/dev/m41t8xclock.c,v
retrieving
hi tech@.
(diff is at the bottom of this message).
references used:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=a89534edaaa7008992b878680490e9b02a665563
http://lwn.net/Articles/555179/
Attansic entries being corrected according to above lwn.net reference.
Ralink
hi tech@.
references used:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=238779
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=257955
Cheers,
Alexey
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: high speed, self powered, config 1, EHCI root hub(0x),
Intel(0x8086), rev 1.00
port 1 addr 2:
previous diff may be mangled. resending.
Index: usbdevs
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs,v
retrieving revision 1.618
diff -u -p -r1.618 usbdevs
--- usbdevs 17 Dec 2013 12:51:14 - 1.618
+++ usbdevs 6 Jan
previous diff may be mangled. resending.
Index: sys/dev/pci/pcidevs
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/pcidevs,v
retrieving revision 1.1708
diff -u -p -r1.1708 pcidevs
--- sys/dev/pci/pcidevs 5 Jan 2014 23:55:25 - 1.1708
This is based on
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=257955
For now, my DWA-140 rev B3 is able to
* attach to run(4) and correctly identify MAC address;
* load firmware on ifconfig up;
* blink LED (so I think something is going thru a radio);
* ifconfig down (LED stops
Our tcpdump has the ability to detect bad TCP and UDP checksums with the
-v flag, but not ICMP and ICMPv6 checksums. Here are two diffs to let
tcpdump detect bad ICMP/ICMPv6 checksums, which should help when
debugging issues caused by such checksums. :)
The first diff (below) is simply a