Try to be more consistent in how various variables are setup and named.
Also remove a memset that is already happeing because we use PR_ZERO on
the allocation. Move to memmove to memcpy because the addrs can not
overlap. Make some simple helper functions static __inline and remove one
of the explic
Currently not able to test this myself. Can somebody verify that
hotplug a *real* expresscard device still works?
Thanks,
Mark
Index: ppb.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/ppb.c,v
retrieving revision 1.56
diff -u -p -r1.56
In order to make the sparc64 iommu code "mpsafe", I need to make sure
the extent manager can be used in an mpsafe manner. The current code
isn't really safe since the extent manager needs to allocate region
descriptors whenever we do a bus_dmamap_load(). The diff below adds a
function to provide
On 20 January 2014 02:05, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> This change allows the arc4random() subsystem to self-initialize from
> boot-supplied data, upon first call. It uses rs_buf[] to build the
> chacha context, then permits drawing of up to 1GB of data without
> entering the difficult reseeding or rek
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:43:22AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I had almost forgotten that wifi hacking can be fun if it results
> in something working.
>
> Tested between two laptops (hostap) and with Berlin's freifunk
> network (ibss). Seems to work but I have no idea about long
> term stabi
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:11:53AM +1300, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Todd C. Miller
> wrote:
> > Perhaps something like this? Only compile-tested.
>
> Looks good. We also need to fix the 'S' line parsing code in sendit()
> and printit() in lpd/printjob.c to use u
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Todd C. Miller
wrote:
> Perhaps something like this? Only compile-tested.
Looks good. We also need to fix the 'S' line parsing code in sendit()
and printit() in lpd/printjob.c to use unsigned long long when parsing
the ino_t instead of trying to store it in an
> On Jan 19, 2014, at 8:47, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> I suspect only a few have noticed, so it probably should be mentioned
> that install/upgrades are also signed now.
>
> The documentation isn't written yet because change is ongoing. Here
> is a rough primer, for one or two usage cases. Mor
I suspect only a few have noticed, so it probably should be mentioned
that install/upgrades are also signed now.
The documentation isn't written yet because change is ongoing. Here
is a rough primer, for one or two usage cases. More install methods
will work, but some are not perfect yet.
As de
This change allows the arc4random() subsystem to self-initialize from
boot-supplied data, upon first call. It uses rs_buf[] to build the
chacha context, then permits drawing of up to 1GB of data without
entering the difficult reseeding or rekeying codepaths.
When other required subsystems are rea
Hello,
I just read slowcgi(8) and one of the sentences read a bit strange to
me. Anyone agree?
Regards,
Patrik Lundin
Index: slowcgi.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/slowcgi/slowcgi.8,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -u -r1.5 s
On 19 January 2014 12:03, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> As done in IPv6 land report how many packets are dropped because we hit
> the rate limiter (net.inet.icmp.errppslimit). On bigger routers it may be
> needed to tune that value up in case to many packets are dropped.
>
> OK?
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
OK
* Kenneth Westerback [2014-01-19 09:56]:
> *But what is the practical problem being addressed? Is dhcp not functional
> with the existing default **ruleset?*
it's not correct and we rely on dhclient falling back to a new
discovery eventually.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
yes, I frequently run into this and always forget to follow up. we
might even want some heuristic for the errppslimit.
anyway, this is good and makes sense. ok.
* Claudio Jeker [2014-01-19 00:04]:
> As done in IPv6 land report how many packets are dropped because we hit
> the rate limiter (net.in
*But what is the practical problem being addressed? Is dhcp not functional
with the existing default **ruleset?*
* Ken*
On 19 January 2014 19:39, Brad Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:10:21AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:57:26PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> >
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 04:10:21AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 09:57:26PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:55:44PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> > > The default PF ruleset as setup by rc is too restrictive. Have the default
> > > ruleset allow for DHCPv6.
> >
16 matches
Mail list logo
