On 13/07/14 4:22 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:21:06PM -0400, Brad Smith said that
On 13/07/14 2:16 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 05:37:51PM +0200, Denis Fondras said that
>from the user's PoV, there shouldn't be more needed than
ifc
hmm, on Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 02:21:06PM -0400, Brad Smith said that
> On 13/07/14 2:16 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
> >hmm, on Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 05:37:51PM +0200, Denis Fondras said that
> >>>
> >>>from the user's PoV, there shouldn't be more needed than
> >>> ifconfig inet autoconf
> >>> ifc
On 13/07/14 2:16 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 05:37:51PM +0200, Denis Fondras said that
from the user's PoV, there shouldn't be more needed than
ifconfig inet autoconf
ifconfig inet6 autoconf
aka inet/inet6 autoconf in hostname.if.
I'm curious to see what w
hmm, on Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 05:37:51PM +0200, Denis Fondras said that
> >
> > from the user's PoV, there shouldn't be more needed than
> > ifconfig inet autoconf
> > ifconfig inet6 autoconf
> > aka inet/inet6 autoconf in hostname.if.
> >
>
> I'm curious to see what will come out of it as
>
> from the user's PoV, there shouldn't be more needed than
> ifconfig inet autoconf
> ifconfig inet6 autoconf
> aka inet/inet6 autoconf in hostname.if.
>
I'm curious to see what will come out of it as I cannot envision any
added value of these autoconf compared to dhclient.
Denis
before I forget half of what we talked about here and to share it,
here's how I think the network autoconfig stuff should work in the
future.
from the user's PoV, there shouldn't be more needed than
ifconfig inet autoconf
ifconfig inet6 autoconf
aka inet/inet6 autoconf in ho
