On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 01:15:16PM -0400, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> What is wrong with "default"? Why is "0.0.0.0/0" and "::/0" better?
>
Nothing wrong per-se. I was comparing the output of "bgpctl sh fib" and "route
show" when I noticed this.
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 07:03:34PM +0200, Denis Fondras wrote:
> When using "route -n", also print numeric value for default route.
I use -n to avoid DNS lookups. "default" does not do that.
So I do not see the benefit of this change. It has been that way
for ever without harm. New behavior wo
When using "route -n", also print numeric value for default route.
Before :
[denis@jig-ai] route -n show -inet6
Routing tables
Internet6:
DestinationGatewayFlags Refs
Use Mtu Prio Iface
default2a00:6060:1::1