Yeah, we override both of 'auth->name' and 'auth->secret’.
Since there is the only difference against your previous diff and
the only place where you touch them I have no objections.
> On 22 Aug 2020, at 18:00, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:32:17PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wro
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:32:17PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Another round, this time obvious sizes which are in immediate scope of
> the free() call, e.g. right below the malloc() call.
>
> This leaves only a few selected free() calls with size zero in
> if_spppsubr.c due to the fact that the
ok mvs@
> On 22 Aug 2020, at 15:32, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>
> Another round, this time obvious sizes which are in immediate scope of
> the free() call, e.g. right below the malloc() call.
>
> This leaves only a few selected free() calls with size zero in
> if_spppsubr.c due to the fact that ther
Another round, this time obvious sizes which are in immediate scope of
the free() call, e.g. right below the malloc() call.
This leaves only a few selected free() calls with size zero in
if_spppsubr.c due to the fact that there is currently no variable to
keep track of username and password string
