>[..]
> it seems a bit unfair of you to hold me to a higher standard than
> the rest of the apache codebase, but ill live :)
i'm not asking you to go back and change existing code but you're
adding, so let's make it nice :)
>> to check for `:' you can use strchr(). i believe you need an ap_pstrdu
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Federico Schwindt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:40 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
> > in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
> > and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
> > all crazy backends we have. this
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:40 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
> in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
> and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
> all crazy backends we have. this works fine except if the apache
> wants to canonicalise something on the "
On 21/07/2011, at 1:16 AM, Sunnz wrote:
> 2011/7/14 David Gwynne :
>> in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
>> and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
>> all crazy backends we have. this works fine except if the apache
>> wants to canonicalise
2011/7/14 David Gwynne :
> in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
> and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
> all crazy backends we have. this works fine except if the apache
> wants to canonicalise something on the "ssl" backends. because the
>
Benny Lofgren wrote:
> On 2011-07-19 08.29, David Gwynne wrote:
> > noone has an opinion?
>
> I like it. I was about to run into exactly the same problem on a
> similar setup in a few days myself, so it couldn't have come in
> more handy. :-)
>
> > would anyone get upset if i committed this?
>
> I'
On 2011-07-19 08.29, David Gwynne wrote:
> noone has an opinion?
I like it. I was about to run into exactly the same problem on a
similar setup in a few days myself, so it couldn't have come in
more handy. :-)
> would anyone get upset if i committed this?
I've tried the patch briefly, and it see
noone has an opinion?
would anyone get upset if i committed this?
dlg
On 14/07/2011, at 1:40 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
> in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
> and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
> all crazy backends we have. this works f
in my environment i have nginx in front of apache to offload ssl
and to let me easily point different parts of the uri namespace at
all crazy backends we have. this works fine except if the apache
wants to canonicalise something on the "ssl" backends. because the
ssl is done in nginx, apache doesnt
