Re: Kernel 9.1 panic with azalia

2021-06-26 Thread tlaronde
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 06:49:17AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > Also any reason to use 9.1 instead of 9.2 or 9.2_STABLE? > (Not that I think it would make a difference for azalia) Practical reason: I start to update the node I'm doing my main programing/developing work on and I then, after havi

Re: Kernel 9.1 panic with azalia

2021-06-25 Thread tlaronde
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 09:32:40PM +, RVP wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, RVP wrote: > > >On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: > > > >>But if azalia is not supported anymore because it crashes the > >>kernel, shouldn't it be removed and not simply be commented out? > >> > > > >I thin

Re: Kernel 9.1 panic with azalia

2021-06-25 Thread Martin Husemann
Also any reason to use 9.1 instead of 9.2 or 9.2_STABLE? (Not that I think it would make a difference for azalia) Martin

Re: Kernel 9.1 panic with azalia

2021-06-25 Thread RVP
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: But if azalia is not supported anymore because it crashes the kernel, shouldn't it be removed and not simply be commented out? I think that your message is the first indication that azalia(4) is slowly bit-rotting... -RVP

Re: Kernel 9.1 panic with azalia

2021-06-25 Thread RVP
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: The new kernel panics at boot time with azalia (it is not crucial since it is a server and I have no use with it but I have added the support since it's here and 7.1.1 has no problem with it). You must've compiled a custom kernel. 9.1 GENERIC h

Re: Kernel 9.1 panic with azalia

2021-06-25 Thread tlaronde
Hello, On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 08:47:30PM +, RVP wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: > > >The new kernel panics at boot time with azalia (it is not crucial since > >it is a server and I have no use with it but I have added the support > >since it's here and 7.1.1 has no

Re: Kernel 9.1 panic with azalia

2021-06-25 Thread RVP
On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, RVP wrote: On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote: But if azalia is not supported anymore because it crashes the kernel, shouldn't it be removed and not simply be commented out? I think that your message is the first indication that azalia(4) is slowly bit-rott

Kernel 9.1 panic with azalia

2021-06-25 Thread tlaronde
Hello, I was trying to update a server, running a NetBSD 7.1.1 (amd64) to NetBSD 9.1. The new kernel panics at boot time with azalia (it is not crucial since it is a server and I have no use with it but I have added the support since it's here and 7.1.1 has no problem with it). It's a production