Re: F13 > F14 Alpha preupgrade fails to find install.img

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:08 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote: > Please see bug: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627377 > > > Any suggestions on further info/help I can provide? > I've filed a bug#624971 earlier about this issue, and probably like Chris Bagwell said, it misused /im

nx in F14

Hi, did anybody successfully run qtnx/nx in F14? Getting - qtnx ** (:4766): WARNING **: AT-SPI: Accessibility bus not found - Using session bus. Process started stderr> Warning: Identity file id.key not accessible: No such fil

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing 389-admin-1.1.11-1.fc14 389-ds-base-1.2.6-1.fc14 audit-viewer-0.7-1.fc14 clive-2.2.13-2.fc14 gtk-equinox-engine-1.20-4.fc14 hugin-2010.0.0-6.fc14 ldns-1.6.6-2.fc14 libuser-0.56.17-1.fc14 mercuria

Interesting New results with F14 ALpha

I replaced the ATI video card with my old GEForce 9600GT. Also, the cat unplugged my USB ATI TV Wonder 650. The F14 Alpha install got an unhandled exception when I tried to tell it to mount sda1 as an NTFS file system. I restarted the DVD installation, which completed nominally. I then reran Ubu

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:56:28 +0200 Zoltan Kota wrote: > No. I have tried again just now. Blank screen with basic video driver. I just tried a few different installs again as well. If I use nomodeset, but let it try the radeon driver, I get a crash in the driver, if I don't use nomodeset, I encoun

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 00:42 +0200, Zoltan Kota wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:11 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: >> >> On 08/26/2010 09:00 AM, Zoltan Kota wrote: >> >> > Hi, >

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 00:42 +0200, Zoltan Kota wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:11 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > >> On 08/26/2010 09:00 AM, Zoltan Kota wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I still was not able to install F14 Alpha with neti

Re: [Fedora QA] #105: F14 Graphics Test Week

#105: F14 Graphics Test Week ---+ Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill Type: defect| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Day | Version:

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:11 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: >> On 08/26/2010 09:00 AM, Zoltan Kota wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I still was not able to install F14 Alpha with netinst.iso. Blank >> > screen after anaconda starts, as described in

F13 > F14 Alpha preupgrade fails to find install.img

Please see bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627377 Any suggestions on further info/help I can provide? Thanks Andy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:02:54 -0400 > Matt McCutchen wrote: > >> Fedora 14 is using systemd as the init system, and it doesn't >> honor /etc/inittab: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626855 > > http://home.comcast.net/~tomhorsley/wisdom/braindump/oss-happens.h

Re: Display issues running FC14a3 under KVM

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:59 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > I booted the Live-CD under KVM and after a bit of minor testing did an > install from that, using the "install" off the default user home page. > The system boots and runs, but I get odd display warnings. > > At startup I get a warn of usin

Re: F14 Alpha - First impressions

> > c) The GUI install wouldn't work, but I fell back to text install. > > > > > > d) I was disappointed that it would not let me select the packages > > >to install (I want KDE not Gnome) > > > > > Need the full install for that, LiveCD is GNOME. > > > > I was using the 'full install'. The k

Re: F14 Alpha - First impressions

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Fulko Hew wrote: > > > > a) I'm disappointed that I couldn't try it in VirtualBox v3.0.8, > >but then again F13 wouldn't install there either. > >(It might work under newer VirtualBox's, but thats all I have right > now. > >(The

Re: F14 Alpha - First impressions

Fulko Hew wrote: > > a) I'm disappointed that I couldn't try it in VirtualBox v3.0.8, >but then again F13 wouldn't install there either. >(It might work under newer VirtualBox's, but thats all I have right now. >(The installation 'infinite loops during system loader phase with a > sta

Display issues running FC14a3 under KVM

I booted the Live-CD under KVM and after a bit of minor testing did an install from that, using the "install" off the default user home page. The system boots and runs, but I get odd display warnings. At startup I get a warn of using a 1x1 window (and being smart enough to not do it), then whe

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:59:01PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > Yea, but my most frequent use case is to do a graphical install > on a machine that is really going to be a server which I would > like to default to runlevel 3 instead of 5. Note that this is a common use case, because the text-gui in

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:27:51AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > section for the systemd v8 issue: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F14_bugs#systemd_package_update_breaks_default_boot_target The "less fragile update" should be pushed to the testing repo RSN. -- Matthew Miller Senior Sys

Re: F14 Alpha - First impressions

On 8/26/2010 8:46 AM, Fulko Hew wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Rahul Sundaram > wrote: > > On 08/25/2010 11:21 PM, Fulko Hew wrote: > > > > a) I'm disappointed that I couldn't try it in VirtualBox v3.0.8, > >but then again F13 would

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:11 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 08/26/2010 09:00 AM, Zoltan Kota wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I still was not able to install F14 Alpha with netinst.iso. Blank > > screen after anaconda starts, as described in the F14 Common Bugs wiki > > page. I have Ati Radeon 9200. As I

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 11:03 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 08/26/2010 09:41 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:11:00 -0400 > > Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > > > >> Specify nomodeset in the kernel cmd line. Known problem and in bz. > > > > During anaconda, I couldn't get any video to

Re: Fedora 14 - X is not working on Laptop

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:28 +0530, A S Alam wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to run Fedora 14 Alpha Live on my laptop, > but X failed to work. Laptop has Hybrid graphics > with Nvidia and Intel HD. > > Nvidia - M330 - X failed to start (same with 'nomodeset') > Intel HD - Hanged > > I have tried with Fe

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:06:55 -0400 Adam Jackson wrote: > The theory here is that if graphics didn't work at install time they're > probably not going to work afterwards either. So if you needed to > resort to VNC or text mode... Yea, but my most frequent use case is to do a graphical install on

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:00 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The release notes are the one canonical thing you should always read. > > I have edited the release notes to state that systemd is a "mostly > compatible" replacement instead of

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 10:27 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > I believe its a wiki. Please go there and help improve the release > > notes. > > The notes already have a link to the common bugs page, which now has a > section for the systemd v8 issue: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F14_b

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 10:18 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:14:59 -0400 > Chris Lumens wrote: > > > The VNC -> runlevel 3 implication is working as designed. > > Though, I'd really like anaconda to have a screen that > let's me choose the runlevel during install, but it isn't >

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 15:00:47 +0200, Zoltan Kota wrote: > > I still was not able to install F14 Alpha with netinst.iso. Blank > screen after anaconda starts, as described in the F14 Common Bugs wiki > page. I have Ati Radeon 9200. As I remember it didn't work with basic > video drive either.

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > The release notes are the one canonical thing you should always read. I have edited the release notes to state that systemd is a "mostly compatible" replacement instead of a "drop-in" replacement, and I have copied the FAQ and Tips and Tr

Re: FC14: Odd yum results

Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) said: > > At the moment, we 'solve' this by doing update pushes in a certain > > order such that this should not happen. (Basically, any number of > > testing pushes, then a stable push, then the branched tree.) > > In order to avoid packages temporarily di

Re: FC14: Odd yum results

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 12:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said: > > Untagging them from updates-testing and removing them from the repo > > way before they appear in the updates repo instead, is bad. It also > > causes broken dependencies temporarily. Those

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:52 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:43:14AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:36 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > > > > I disagree, there really is only so much we as an internet based > > > community can do to help the users and pu

Re: FC14: Odd yum results

Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said: > Untagging them from updates-testing and removing them from the repo > way before they appear in the updates repo instead, is bad. It also > causes broken dependencies temporarily. Those make testing less fun > and lead to confusion when spending karma

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:01:02AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:41 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > Or maybe you were thinking of this: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F14_Alpha_release_announcement > > NetworkManager and PulseAudio as examples in the context ar

F-14 Branched report: 20100826 changes

Compose started at Thu Aug 26 13:15:26 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On 08/26/2010 09:41 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:11:00 -0400 > Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > >> Specify nomodeset in the kernel cmd line. Known problem and in bz. > > During anaconda, I couldn't get any video to work on my system > at all with ati or vesa. I installed with VNC and af

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:41 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > Do you happen to mean that: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_release_notes#Better_System_and_Session_Management > I just quoted the whole entry. If somewhere else there is something > "real" then I would start by putt

F14 Gnome Panel

Anyone else lost the ability to move gnome panel via alt + click in fedora 14? My memory is not great but I believe this worked in 13 just wanted to confirm before I file a bug. -Erinn -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:17:23AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:12 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:47:17AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, let's try this "first item" in its entirety. > > > > > > Oh, I'm sorry ... did you mis

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 10:27 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:17:23AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:12 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > Somebody who is missing something is you; namely that an information > > > to deal with a fall out is la

Re: If you cannot boot after installing systemd v8...

> > > > # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target > > /etc/systemd/system/default.target > > > > hope it's fixed now :) > > I've done this, and rebooted my F14 Alpha system and it seems to work > as promised. Graphical bootup worked as it did beforehand. > > I also added this to the common bu

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:17:23AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:12 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:47:17AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, let's try this "first item" in its entirety. > > > > > > Oh, I'm sorry ... did you mis

Re: If you cannot boot after installing systemd v8...

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:33:23PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote: > 2010/8/26 cornel panceac > > > > > > > > >> > > # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target > >> /etc/systemd/systemd/default.target > >> > > > >> > > > > here's what i get: > > > > # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.targe

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

2010/8/26 seth vidal > > > I think the point is that the one thing we can do to help users is to > "throw it all away and start over" LESS often. > > > > -sv > > good point. -- Among the maxims on Lord Naoshige's wall, there was this one: "Matters of great concern should be treated lightly." M

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:14:59 -0400 Chris Lumens wrote: > The VNC -> runlevel 3 implication is working as designed. Though, I'd really like anaconda to have a screen that let's me choose the runlevel during install, but it isn't a big deal (until changing the runlevel becomes an adventure :-). --

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:12 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:47:17AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > > > > > OK, let's try this "first item" in its entirety. > > > > Oh, I'm sorry ... did you miss the Alpha tag on the ISO you > > downloaded? > > Somebody who is missing s

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:47:17AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > > > OK, let's try this "first item" in its entirety. > > Oh, I'm sorry ... did you miss the Alpha tag on the ISO you > downloaded? Somebody who is missing something is you; namely that an information to deal with a fall out is lacki

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:47:17 -0500 Adam Miller wrote: > Those of us on this mailing list spend time testing > Fedora and we should provide *constructive* feedback I thought the suggestion earlier in this thread to provide a single place where "heads up" documentation about things users are going

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

> > I have edited /etc/inittab to change :3: to :5: in the > > one line in there, but that didn't change anything. > > (Apparently it picked runlevel 3 as the default because > > X wouldn't work in the installer and I had to use VNC). > > > > That wont work inittab is slowly being deprecated add 1

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:10:28AM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 08/26/2010 07:17 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > OTOH adding '5' there may just work (maybe). > > I made the experience that I can add in F14 the runlevel in the GRUB > boot line, so I can boot into rl 5 or 3 without problem. Wi

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 09:43:14AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:36 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > > > I disagree, there really is only so much we as an internet based > > community can do to help the users and publicly providing the > > documentation in multiple outlets is abou

Re: Help review the preupgrade-cli test please

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:24 AM, He Rui wrote: > Greetings, > > I just created a case for testing preupgrade-cli. Anyone who is > interested in it or used to upgrade by using this command please help > review this test: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_cli > > Any suggesti

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:02:45PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 21:18 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >> > >> > http://home.comcast.net/~tomhorsley/wisdom/braindump/oss-happens.html >> > >> > Another example of the Vo

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:36 -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > I disagree, there really is only so much we as an internet based > community can do to help the users and publicly providing the > documentation in multiple outlets is about as good as it gets. I don't > have everyone's phone number who downl

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:11:00 -0400 Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > Specify nomodeset in the kernel cmd line. Known problem and in bz. During anaconda, I couldn't get any video to work on my system at all with ati or vesa. I installed with VNC and after getting updates, the ATI driver works fine. I'm p

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 21:13:20 -0700, >  Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> Vogon, not Volgan. :) And yes, that issue isn't documented, mainly > > That's not fair. The plans for the destruction of Earth were on display. > If people couldn't b

Re: F14 Alpha blank screen during install

On 08/26/2010 09:00 AM, Zoltan Kota wrote: > Hi, > > I still was not able to install F14 Alpha with netinst.iso. Blank > screen after anaconda starts, as described in the F14 Common Bugs wiki > page. I have Ati Radeon 9200. As I remember it didn't work with basic > video drive either. I will try it

F14 Alpha blank screen during install

Hi, I still was not able to install F14 Alpha with netinst.iso. Blank screen after anaconda starts, as described in the F14 Common Bugs wiki page. I have Ati Radeon 9200. As I remember it didn't work with basic video drive either. I will try it again. Is that problem still exist? A new bug was ope

Fedora 14 - X is not working on Laptop

Hi, I tried to run Fedora 14 Alpha Live on my laptop, but X failed to work. Laptop has Hybrid graphics with Nvidia and Intel HD. Nvidia - M330 - X failed to start (same with 'nomodeset') Intel HD - Hanged I have tried with Fedora 13, but it is not working, need to install with text (vnc) mode an

Re: Help review the preupgrade-cli test please

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:24 +0800, He Rui wrote: > Greetings, > > I just created a case for testing preupgrade-cli. Anyone who is > interested in it or used to upgrade by using this command please help > review this test: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_cli > > Any sugg

Re: F14 Alpha - First impressions

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/25/2010 11:21 PM, Fulko Hew wrote: > > > > a) I'm disappointed that I couldn't try it in VirtualBox v3.0.8, > >but then again F13 wouldn't install there either. > >(It might work under newer VirtualBox's, but thats all I have

Re: If you cannot boot after installing systemd v8...

2010/8/26 cornel panceac > > > > >> > > # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target >> /etc/systemd/systemd/default.target >> > > >> > > here's what i get: > > # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target > /etc/systemd/systemd/default.target > ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/systemd/syste

Re: If you cannot boot after installing systemd v8...

> > > > > > # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target > /etc/systemd/systemd/default.target > > > > here's what i get: # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target /etc/systemd/systemd/default.target ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/systemd/systemd/default.target': No such file or directo

Re: If you cannot boot after installing systemd v8...

thank you, i was wondering if i have to reinstall :) -- Among the maxims on Lord Naoshige's wall, there was this one: "Matters of great concern should be treated lightly." Master Ittei commented, "Matters of small concern should be treated seriously." (Ghost Dog : The Way of The Samurai) -- test

Re: If you cannot boot after installing systemd v8...

FYI, Fedora 14 Alpha testers: Please read the following, since this update issue will hit you after you install Fedora 14 Alpha and then update. We probably need to spread this news out wider and add to the Common F14 bugs page. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Vaclav Misek wrote: > On

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On 08/26/2010 12:49 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > My continuing adventures in fedora 14 alpha have finally > gotten it installed, and I can even boot, but it insists > on coming up in runlevel 3 (apparently). It won't start > KDM and I get no graphical login. > What happens if you start kdm in run le

rawhide report: 20100826 changes

Compose started at Thu Aug 26 08:15:27 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On 08/26/2010 07:17 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:02:45PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 21:18 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >>> >>> http://home.comcast.net/~tomhorsley/wisdom/braindump/oss-happens.html >>> >>> Another example of the Vogon effect :-).

Re: gnash-8.8

On 08/24/2010 11:52 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > I tried the new gnash on both firefox and konqueror, but it did not work. It > is supposed > to display all youtube videos, but all I got was a black box and a message > stating that > an error occurred and I should try later (with konquero

Re: FC14: Odd yum results

On 08/25/2010 12:53 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > AIUI it's just like update pushes - it depends on the compose/push > process, which traditionally we do once a day, because it's a somewhat > complex and time-consuming operation. Wasn't it supposed to move from manual to automatic? Rahul -- tes

Re: F14 Alpha - First impressions

On 08/25/2010 11:21 PM, Fulko Hew wrote: > > a) I'm disappointed that I couldn't try it in VirtualBox v3.0.8, >but then again F13 wouldn't install there either. >(It might work under newer VirtualBox's, but thats all I have right > now. >(The installation 'infinite loops during system

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

On 08/26/2010 07:00 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > I remember this happening with upstart--briefly, and I mentioned that a > comment should go in /etc/inittab, and I think Bill Nottingham fixed it > in a few hours (without me even filing a bug.) > > As long as there's a comment in /etc/inittab on how