Since F15 this does not seem able to enable httpd or
anything as far as I can tell. "enable" and "disable"
are greyed out.
How is one expected to manage Fedora as a server
if services can not be enabled?
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZM
The 32 bit redhat-lsb does the trick.
Shouldn't there be a "32 bit support" group that pulls
in these files??
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software"
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 00:16, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 07:11 AM, Peter Reed wrote:
>> This will not resolve the dependency problem. It requires all the i686
>> packages not the x86_64 packages I do not think it is a true x86_64 based
>> package. I would have to run it each time to see
On 07/20/2011 07:11 AM, Peter Reed wrote:
> This will not resolve the dependency problem. It requires all the i686
> packages not the x86_64 packages I do not think it is a true x86_64 based
> package. I would have to run it each time to see what the next depency it
> would fail on and install
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 03:28:09 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 01:06 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> > I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
> > It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
> > Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
> >
> > /usr/bin/goog
Michael Cronenworth on 07/19/2011 04:36 PM wrote:
> I haven't discovered any conversations beside the one comment on the TB
> 5.0 bodhi update.
Nevermind. After looking at *closed* tickets, I found it.
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4828
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Is anyone aware of the duplicate TB update for F15?
Both 3.0.11 and 5.0 got pushed to stable at the same time with 3.0.11
winning out.
The thunderbird-lightning package was also pushed, which is for 5.0 only.
I haven't discovered any conversations beside the one comment on the TB
5.0 bodhi upd
On 07/20/2011 01:06 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
> It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
> Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
>
> /usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3: bad ELF
> interpreter
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> If that's the only reason, then we should really try to use kvm instead,
> since qemu-kvm recently learned how to inject arbitrary scancodes, and
> libvirt 0.9.4 is gaining support for exposing that capability from command
> line. Fedora gains a
On 07/19/2011 12:50 PM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Thank you guys for the quick reply. Comments inline.
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
>>
>> Cool, we're always looking for ways to do better testing. As James said,
>> honqing and twu are more actively working on the insta
Hey,
Thank you guys for the quick reply. Comments inline.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
>
> Cool, we're always looking for ways to do better testing. As James said,
> honqing and twu are more actively working on the installer automation
> but I have a couple of design questio
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 06:05 -0400, Tao Wu wrote:
> > Greetings folks,
> >
> > Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide
> > acceptance test run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention. It is
> > unfortunately that the rawhide installation version ha
#225: Request for F16 Power Management test day
-+--
Reporter: jskarvad | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major| Milesto
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:06:31 PM Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
>
>> I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
>> It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
>> Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
>>
>> /usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleear
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:06:31 PM Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> > I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
> > It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
> > Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
> >
>
On Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:06:31 PM Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
> It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
> Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
>
> /usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3: bad ELF
Hi, folks. The Test Day cycle for Fedora 16 will open shortly, and we're
putting out the call for anyone who has an idea for a Test Day. There
are many open slots on the schedule -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Fedora_16_test_days - and if they all
fill up or you would like to run a set of Test
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 11:14 -0600, Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> On 07/19/2011 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > Conclusion: try 'yum install redhat-lsb'.
>
>
> Adam,
>
> yum provides /lib/ld-lsb.so.3
>
> Is another way to find the package.
I have a philosophical objection to file-based de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/19/2011 11:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Conclusion: try 'yum install redhat-lsb'.
Adam,
yum provides /lib/ld-lsb.so.3
Is another way to find the package.
Kevin
- --
Get my public GnuPG key from
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/19/2011 11:06 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth. It installs and
> runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither Fedora 14 or Fedora 15
> would run it:
>
> /usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleear
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 10:06 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
> It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
> Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
>
> /usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3: bad ELF
>
I downloaded the 64 bit rpm flavor of Google Earth.
It installs and runs on 64 bit Scientific Linux. Neither
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 would run it:
/usr/bin/google-earth: ./googleearth-bin: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3: bad ELF
interpreter: No such file or directory
Is there a trick to get this to run?
--
On 07/19/2011 09:49 AM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Posted this to the wrong mailing list (David Cantrell suggested using
> this one instead).
>
> Linking to avoid re-typing :), my apologies:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-July/msg00090.html
>
> In a nutsh
The 7/18 64 bit electronic-lab live dvd fails hard disk
install with an unhandled exception.
Gnome 3 fails to load. System is an Nvidia GTX 460 SE
on Intel i5 with 8 GB ram.
On restart, the live Linux should eject the disc,
or at least unlock the eject button.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 17:49 +0200, Sergio Rubio wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Posted this to the wrong mailing list (David Cantrell suggested using
> this one instead).
>
> Linking to avoid re-typing :), my apologies:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-July/msg00090.html
>
>
Greetings!
Posted this to the wrong mailing list (David Cantrell suggested using
this one instead).
Linking to avoid re-typing :), my apologies:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-July/msg00090.html
In a nutshell, we are looking for better ways to test our Anaconda
based i
#224: Joining proventesters request
--+-
Reporter: mkrizek | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: minor| Milestone:
#224: Joining proventesters request
--+-
Reporter: mkrizek | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: minor| Milest
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 06:05 -0400, Tao Wu wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide acceptance test
> run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention. It is unfortunately that the
> rawhide installation version has not passed the major test, please
#224: Joining proventesters request
--+-
Reporter: mkrizek | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: minor| Milest
#224: Joining proventesters request
-+--
Reporter: mkrizek | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone:
Com
Compose started at Tue Jul 19 08:15:24 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-12
Dne 18.7.2011 07:51, Sudhir Dharanendraiah napsal(a):
> My name is Sudhir and I'm from India (GMT +5:30). Being in the Quality
> team for over 5 years, dealing with bugs has become part of my IT career
> life. I was associated with data center support in the early part of my
> career. I have vas
Greetings folks,
Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide acceptance test
run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention. It is unfortunately that the
rawhide installation version has not passed the major test, please refer to the
bug 723144. Let's expect the exciting coming
Hi all,
I would like to just shortly re-introduce myself. Last week I rejoined Fedora
QA team after 5 months spent as an exchange student in Denmark. In upcoming
months I will be busy with rpm packaging, notably autotest, and helping with
developing AutoQA. I am looking forward to working with
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Resolu
36 matches
Mail list logo
