The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11207/nsd-3.2.13-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10934/dropbear-0.55-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11190/xen-4.1.2-9.fc16
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 20:26 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Scott Poore wrote:
> >
> > No text mode installs at all? That seems like a pretty critical function
> > to me.
>
> exactly, many ARM releases depend on interactive install using a rs232
> connection as
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Scott Poore wrote:
>
> No text mode installs at all? That seems like a pretty critical function to
> me.
exactly, many ARM releases depend on interactive install using a rs232
connection as terminal.
FC
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 15:42:03 -0700,
"T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote:
On Friday, July 27, 2012, Frank Murphy wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
Please file
On Friday, July 27, 2012, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
Please file a bug against both these packages. File conflicts are forbidden
by the
On 07/27/2012 09:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, to a certain extent it's academic. I suspect that if QA was
strongly of the opinion that the feature isn't sufficiently complete,
FESCo would give substantial weight to that input in making its
determination. But it's FESCo that owns the featur
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 21:51 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 09:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
> >>> It is about discussion to accept this change. If there wi
On 07/27/2012 09:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaco
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 16:26 -0400, Scott Poore wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Robyn Bergeron"
> > To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:15:27 PM
> > Subject: Re: [criteria update] Serial console
> >
> > I think most of these questions got
> > answere
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 14:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > > It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
> > > opinions against this change, we will let
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:38 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this alpha criterion:
>
> 'The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to
> detect and mount an existing de
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 15:59 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
>
> 'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
> supported interfaces '
>
> to
>
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 07:19 -0700, Joe Wulf wrote:
> Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be
> moved to?
> That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are
> maintained, yet rational is provided for why they are not worked in
> this release.
>
>
> Just a th
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:02 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
> > opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaconda
> > will have to make their best to b
- Original Message -
> From: "Robyn Bergeron"
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 1:15:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [criteria update] Serial console
>
> I think most of these questions got
> answered at the FESCo meeting where the feature was approved.
>
> http://mee
On 07/27/2012 02:24 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
Generic rescue images would still work for most problems but I'd tend
to agree: a final release with a non-working rescue mode is pretty
uncool and seems like a bad precedent.
In any case if the plan is to extend installer initrd with the rescue
mo
On 07/27/2012 11:11 AM, Scott Poore wrote:
- Original Message -
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion
with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this beta [2] criterion:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
serial console interface'
- Original Message -
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion
> with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this beta [2] criterion:
>
> 'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
> serial console interface'
>
> Reason (according to Chris): (
On 07/27/2012 02:19 PM, Joe Wulf wrote:
Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be
moved to?
That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are
maintained, yet rational is provided for why they are not worked in
this release.
Well I suppose Anaconda could
On 07/27/2012 02:14 PM, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is about discussion to accept this change. If there will be lot of
opinions against this change, we will let it be as it is and anaconda
will have to make their best to bring rescue mod. We can also change
this criterion. It's on discussion. Note t
On 07/27/2012 10:17 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 27/07/12 14:22, Kevin Martin wrote:
>> On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>> Transaction Check Error:
>>>file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
>>> gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
>>> gnupg-1.4
On 27/07/12 17:34, Tom London wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Frank Murphy
Same error on koji kernel-build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4336751
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6751/4336751/root.log
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test m
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 27/07/12 14:22, Kevin Martin wrote:
>
>> On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> Transaction Check Error:
>>>file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.**gz from install of
>>> gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from pack
It is clear that different scenarios require different rules.
I have installed Fedora for three different friends. All at different physical
locations from my place. These people have no computer knowledge, so giving
them elevated permissions spells disaster. However they must to be able to
On 27/07/12 14:22, Kevin Martin wrote:
On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
Do you need both gnupg and gnupg2 on the sam
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Petr Schindler wrote:
It is a big problem. Lot of things will be broken (won't be in new
anaconda for F18, but should be again in next releases,
hopefully). ...
... and I hope that
the discussion within this threads will lead to some action - for me it
would be better to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/27/2012 02:53 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
>> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion
>> with Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
>>
>> 'The rescue mode of the
Question: Is there a 'deferred' state these kinds of issues can be moved to?
That might be an acceptable middle-ground so that issues are maintained, yet
rational is provided for why they are not worked in this release.
Just a thought.
-Joe
>
> From: Petr Sch
On Pá, 2012-07-27 at 08:53 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
> > Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> > Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
> >
> > 'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect
It is a big problem. Lot of things will be broken (won't be in new
anaconda for F18, but should be again in next releases, hopefully). For
example, we use serial console a lot and for f18 it won't work. I'm here
only proposing changes because of the state of anaconda and I hope that
the discussion
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
supported interfaces '
to
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
suppor
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to change this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
supported interfaces '
to
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
suppor
Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this final criterion [2]:
>
> 'The installer must be able to complete an installation using any
> network-attached storage devices (e.g. iSCSI, FCoE
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this final criterion [2]:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using any
network-attached storage devices (e.g. iSCSI, FCoE, Fibre Channel)'
Reason (according to Chris): (T
Once upon a time, Petr Schindler said:
> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
> Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
>
> 'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount
> (read-write and read-only) LVM, encrypted, and RAID
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]:
'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and mount
(read-write and read-only) LVM, encrypted, and RAID (BIOS, hardware, and
software) installations'
Re
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this beta [2] criterion:
'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the serial
console interface'
Reason (according to Chris): (This criterion) will need to be removed for
Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion with
Chris Lumens, I propose to delete this alpha criterion:
'The rescue mode of the installer must start successfully and be able to
detect and mount an existing default installation'
Reason (according to Chris): There's been no w
On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
> gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
> gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
>
Do you need both gnupg and gnupg2 on the same system at the same time? What
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:09:03 +0200,
Karel Volný wrote:
if the user is local then DO NOT ask for admin privileges (else
the user will just cut the power supply which is worse than
killing others' running processes)
I'd prefer to keep that option. A local user would be less likely to powe
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-11182/xen-4.1.2-24.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10892/perl-DBD-Pg-
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10934/dropbear-0.55-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10314/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10871/perl-DBD
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of
gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package
gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686
--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorapro
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Karel Volný wrote:
> but the warning should not prevent _any_ eligible user from
> powering off/rebooting, it should just provide a possibility to
> reconsider
+1
FC
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Dne Čt 26. července 2012 21:36:20, Adam Pribyl napsal(a):
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, ergodic wrote:
> > Karel your philosophy is correct. I have seen this issue
> > when my grandchildren complained that they could not turn of
> > their box after it was was upgraded to F-17. That is why I
> > filed Bu
45 matches
Mail list logo