Re: Many different failures with Fedora-19-Beta-TC3-x86_64-netinst.iso, no successes

Ok, I just figured out how to file a bug. There's too many different things that one needs to log into for this. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959729 I'm not sure I did the right thing for the "Component" field. I selected "ht", which is one of the two conflicting packages. Perha

Re: Many different failures with Fedora-19-Beta-TC3-x86_64-netinst.iso, no successes

I would like to create a bug in bugzilla for this issue, but I can't seem to locate a button to do so. Probably a noob issue. Regardless, how do I do so? Well I should have thought to look in /tmp. But that also seems like a design flaw: why doesn't anaconda put the log files where people kno

Fedora 18 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 116 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18 85 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2131/rubygem-rdoc-3.12-6.fc18 81 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upd

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 303 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 115 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 85 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up

Re: Beta TC3 karma requests

On 05/05/13 09:48, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > > On May 4, 2013 6:44 PM, "Ed Greshko" > wrote: > > > > On 05/05/13 04:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 12:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > >> Hey folks! Just wanted to let everyone know, if TC3

Re: Beta TC3 karma requests

On May 4, 2013 6:44 PM, "Ed Greshko" wrote: > > On 05/05/13 04:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 12:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Hey folks! Just wanted to let everyone know, if TC3 installation is more > >> or less working for you, please up-karma > >> https://admin.fed

Re: Many different failures with Fedora-19-Beta-TC3-x86_64-netinst.iso, no successes

> I do not see where any logs are for this. Anaconda keeps its logs in /tmp, not in /var/log. The syslog is not in /var/log/messages but instead is in /tmp/syslog. -- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Beta TC3 karma requests

On 05/05/13 04:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 12:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Hey folks! Just wanted to let everyone know, if TC3 installation is more >> or less working for you, please up-karma >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-blivet-0.12-1.fc19,anaconda

Many different failures with Fedora-19-Beta-TC3-x86_64-netinst.iso, no successes

I have tried installing from Fedora-19-Beta-TC3-x86_64-netinst.iso on three occasions now. System is VMWare Fusion 5.0.3, each time with a virgin VM with new 20GB drive. The first time it hung during installation. I failed to write down the package it said it was hung at: I decided I would run

TC3 testing

Recent Fedora 19 kernels have been flakey on my ECS 945GCT-m/1333 motherboard with a Celeron 430 and 2GB RAM. That combination has been rock solid with Fedora 16 but Fedora 19 locks up the disk i/o with the disk activity light on solid. I like the Celeron 430 because its power drain is low. I

QA:Testcase_desktop_updates proposal

Dear Testers: I have run the test at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_updates several fimes recently and would like to propose the following clarifiction addition for others who might run this test. How to Test step 5 reads "Wait for more updates to become available, manually

Re: Beta TC3 karma requests

On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 12:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Just wanted to let everyone know, if TC3 installation is more > or less working for you, please up-karma > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-blivet-0.12-1.fc19,anaconda-19.24-1.fc19 Oh, and please don't anyone -1 t

Beta TC3 karma requests

Hey folks! Just wanted to let everyone know, if TC3 installation is more or less working for you, please up-karma https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-blivet-0.12-1.fc19,anaconda-19.24-1.fc19 and https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7275/python-meh-0.24-1.fc19 so we can

Re: Anaconda Q

On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 07:29 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > How does one get the new Anaconda to allow adjusting the sizes of the > partitions it creates? Use custom partitioning. It should be pretty obvious in there. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitte

Anaconda Q

How does one get the new Anaconda to allow adjusting the sizes of the partitions it creates? -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius

Re: F18 updates-testing broken?

On Sat, 04 May 2013 21:19:25 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/04/13 18:45, Frank Murphy wrote: > > Getting this on two 64 bit boxes > > > 3.0.16-3.fc18 updates-testing > espeak.x86_64 1.47.08-1.fc18 > updates-testing > > and so on > Curious some work h

Re: F18 updates-testing broken?

On 05/04/13 18:45, Frank Murphy wrote: > Getting this on two 64 bit boxes > > > updates-testing/18/x86_64/updateinfo > | 924 kB 00:00:00 An update notice is broken, or duplicate, > skipping: FEDORA-2013-4957 An update notice is broken, or duplicate, > skipping: FEDORA-2013-4952 An update notice is

F-19 Branched report: 20130504 changes

Compose started at Sat May 4 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [byzanz] byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) =

rawhide report: 20130504 changes

Compose started at Sat May 4 08:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [byzanz] byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit) [cinnamon] cinnamon-menu-editor-1.6.7-7.fc19.noarch requires gnome-panel [d

F18 updates-testing broken?

Getting this on two 64 bit boxes updates-testing/18/x86_64/updateinfo | 924 kB 00:00:00 An update notice is broken, or duplicate, skipping: FEDORA-2013-4957 An update notice is broken, or duplicate, skipping: FEDORA-2013-4952 An update notice is broken, or duplicate, skipping: FEDORA-2013-0808 A