Re: fedup failure

2014-11-08 Thread Per Bothner
On 11/07/2014 05:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 16:48 -0800, Per Bothner wrote: I wanted to try to updating to what will soon be Fedora 21. I tried using fedup, but failed miserably. Did I use the correct incantation? Well. Not according to the release information,

Re: fedup failure

2014-11-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 00:13 -0800, Per Bothner wrote: Then when I tried: fedup --network 21 -v --product=workstation --debuglog=/var/log/fedupdebug4.log it worked. I'm using Fedora 21/rawhide now. These are not the same thing. Rawhide is now F22. See

rawhide report: 20141108 changes

2014-11-08 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Nov 8 05:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [audtty]

F-21 Branched report: 20141108 changes

2014-11-08 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Nov 8 07:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires

Re: Linux multi-boot release criterion discussion, redux

2014-11-08 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 11/07/2014 04:24 PM, Peter Jones wrote: On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:34:16AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: More criteria time, folks! So we managed to get the Windows multi-boot criterion revised and an OS X multi-boot criterion added, but we did not yet manage to come to a consensus on

Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.

2014-11-08 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 11/05/2014 09:21 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Sorry to start yet another thread on the same issue But I only just now discover that once you install Fedora Workstation you can't install another desktop Try, # yum swap

Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.

2014-11-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 09:05 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I notice that dnf does not have swap. Is this intentional? Try: signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.

2014-11-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 14:46 +, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 09:05 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I notice that dnf does not have swap. Is this intentional? Try: Gah, sent it early:

Re: Linux multi-boot release criterion discussion, redux

2014-11-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 08:45 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: Before discussion any criteria for whatever release, perhaps there should be a discussion on how we would like things to work and what we really do not care about. Also, I believe that the appropriate place for this discussion is

Re: One Desktop and one Desktop ONLY.

2014-11-08 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote: I notice that dnf does not have swap. Is this intentional? Yes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110780 Rahul -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: fedup failure

2014-11-08 Thread Per Bothner
On 11/08/2014 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Can you run 'rpm -qa | grep fc22' and verify you have no Fedora 22 packages installed? You should not. Thanks! Just one: $ sudo rpm -qa | grep fc22 shim-unsigned-0.8-1.fc22.x86_64 I'm afraid I don't know what that is. -- --Per Bothner

Re: fedup failure

2014-11-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 10:06 -0800, Per Bothner wrote: On 11/08/2014 12:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Can you run 'rpm -qa | grep fc22' and verify you have no Fedora 22 packages installed? You should not. Thanks! Just one: $ sudo rpm -qa | grep fc22 shim-unsigned-0.8-1.fc22.x86_64

Re: fedup failure

2014-11-08 Thread Per Bothner
On 11/08/2014 11:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Ah, that's actually fine. As a special case, the fc22 build of shim was sent to all supported releases as it cuts down on the Secure Boot signing/verification work - we don't have to verify four actually-the-same builds of shim. So, looks fine.

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

2014-11-08 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:17:25 -0500 Jonathan Corbet corbet...@lwn.net wrote: I'm pretty well mystified, but, given my general lack of skills in this part of the system, that's not surprising. My next step, perhaps, is to start disabling boot-time unit files until I find the one that makes

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

2014-11-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 16:50 -0500, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:17:25 -0500 Jonathan Corbet corbet...@lwn.net wrote: I'm pretty well mystified, but, given my general lack of skills in this part of the system, that's not surprising. My next step, perhaps, is to start

F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning

2014-11-08 Thread Bidski
I am trying to install F21 on my system. Unfortunately I am running in to some of issues. First issue is that I can not run the regular installer from the LiveUSB I created (this is likely to be due to my GeForce GTX 750TI graphics being not completely supported yet. Running the installer in low

Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning

2014-11-08 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2014-11-09 at 11:28 +1100, Bidski wrote: HDD: 4TB Western Digital Caviar Green SATA 6GB/s (Windows 7 64-bit is installed in one half of this hard drive with a GPT partition table). Well, the errors you're getting seem rather odd. Are you sure it *actually* has a GPT partition table?

Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning

2014-11-08 Thread Bidski
  My apologies. Apparently when you ask Windows to create a GPT it decides that what you really wanted was an MBR. I shall work on rectifying this now. I shall let you know the result. - Original Message - From: Bidski To:Adam Williamson Cc: Sent:Sun, 09 Nov 2014 13:52:21 +1100