The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
125 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12739
python-kdcproxy-0.3.2-1.fc23
107 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5eb2131441
conntrack-tools-1.4.2-9.fc23
78 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
242 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878
echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22
191 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185
ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22
124 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd
On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 09:46 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:26:54 -0500 (EST)
> Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> > > I feel that for something as important as system upgrade, we should
> > > provide a better level of quality and assurance for upgrading
> > > across 2 releases. Currently we
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:42 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-12-07/fedora-qa.2015-12-07-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151206:
Mate live i386
No images in Rawhide 20151206 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 2 of 52
ID: 486 Te
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:26:54 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > I feel that for something as important as system upgrade, we should
> > provide a better level of quality and assurance for upgrading
> > across 2 releases. Currently we have no criterion and testing it is
> > just an afterthought, n
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2015-12-07
> # Time: 16:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
>
> Greetings testers!
>
> It's QA meeting time again! Let's try again for the meeting that got
> cancelled la
> I definitely like the idea of tracking this better and making sure to
> tell releng whats needed. In fact, I think that may be all we need,
> especially with bodhi2 pushing updates faster than 1 did.
I see 3 parts here:
1. tracking these issues (that will be done by QA with our new trackers)
2.
Compose started at Mon Dec 7 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0