Re: proposal: Default application functionality criterion reduction

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:31 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > There are some high-profile types of applications that I considered > including in the list above, but didn’t in the end: > > * word editor (e.g. libreoffice-writer) > > * spreadsheet editor (e.g. libreoffice-calc) > > * video player

Re: Proposal: Add release announcement post to Go/No-Go criteria

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 4:44 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > We have a proposal to add a fourth criterion for the > Go/No-Go decision, beginning with F29 Final: > > 4. The release announcement post for Fedora Magazine is substantially > complete > I'm torn on this one... I think the release announcement

Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:40 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd like to propose that we add the following criteria to Beta for Fedora > 30+: > * Printing must work on at least one printer available to Fedora QA. > > and this to Final for Fedora 30+: > * Printing must work on at least one

Re: Criteria proposal: applying 'post-install' criteria to live and appliance images

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Does this general approach sound good? If so, I'll post some drafts > later in the week. Thanks! > Sounds great to me. -- Jared Smith -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: rawhide report: 20151119 changes

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report < rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > [nodejs-mime-types] > nodejs-mime-types-2.1.7-1.fc24.noarch requires npm(mime-db) < > 0:1.20 > I've fixed this in Rawhide. -- Jared Smith -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Corbet corbet...@lwn.net wrote: - Under F21, suspend seems to work fine, but there is no response to the power button (or any other input). One has to hold the power button until the firmware gets fed up and powers things down hard. I had the

Re: test request: kernel 3.17 for F21

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi, folks! It'd be great if people could test this kernel: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-3.17.0-301.fc21 I've been running the kernel all day on my primary laptop, and it seems rock solid. I

Re: Grub an kernel update

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:31 AM, miguel bokerones.fri...@gmail.com wrote: I have a small problem. When you boot the pc, which selects the kernel is not the last, that is, the newest, but selects a lower each time you install a kernel update.

Re: Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Shutting down, logging out and rebooting must work using standard console commands and the mechanisms offered (if any) by all release-blocking desktops. I think this is reasonable and well put. -- Jared

Re: kernel-3.15 series fail to load gnome desktop

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote: With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome desktop fails to load. I'm wondering if this is hardware-specific, as I'm running an up to date rawhide system with the 3.15 kernel on my

Re: 32 bit Fedora 19: WINEyes NFS:no 8 cores:no

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote: On a 3770 with 4 cores and hyperthreading, startup failed with insufficient memory to initialize the 8 threads. Once again, you're so concise it's cryptic. Please try to be more descriptive as you report

Re: Major criteria re-write / re-design proposal

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:45 AM, moshe nahmias mosheg...@gmail.com wrote: I like better the grey background with normal text, it makes the lines easier to find and breaks the monotonous white background. On the other hand it's a matter of taste more then anything. I have to agree here -- I

Re: Blocker process: tracker bug / whiteboard naming proposal

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Hi folks! We're running a FUDCon NA workshop session today to try and actually knock out some QA 'low-hanging fruit', and the one we tried to deal with this morning is the blocker tracker bug names. We had some grand

Re: new criterion proposal: core kickstart commands

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Do I see two volunteers to help fix kickstart bugs? :) If it came down to crunch time, and a kickstart bug was keeping us from being able to do a release, you bet I'd volunteer to help fix the kickstart bug. -- Jared

Re: new criterion proposal: core kickstart commands

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote: I'm not fully decided either way, maybe a bit in favor; I hope some people will comment here as well. Just keep in mind we want to keep the core command set small. I agree -- %include and %ksappend should be part of the

Re: EC2 AMI Test Case Review Request

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: I see what you mean but I'm a little hesitant to add those kind of details to the test case. It might be better to have a separate wiki page for getting started with EC2 instructions. I'll look around to see if there is already

Re: I/O Bound Procs Clobbering Responsiveness

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote: This a subjective comment, but it seems that I/O bound procs such as disk copy are seriously impacting GUI response more than before. I noticed the same thing yesterday while trying to create a live usb key

Re: F16: Box hangs sometimes if initiating the reboot by the gnome3 menu

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote: Sometimes, if I try to reboot my box by the gnome-shell (user button top right-poweroff-restart), the box hangs, and the reboot seems to fail. In all these cases, I have to press the power button or the reset

Re: Post-TC1 strategizin'

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: Why did this happen?  What went wrong?  The strategy should be based on that. James and Adam have already begun to outline some of the reasons on the F16 QA Retrospective page on the wiki. Everyone is welcome to add their