Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-10-14 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > That sounds workable, so long as someone's actually making sure we > *do* > comply with those. Has anyone checked that yet? I'd rather not throw > it > in the criteria and then have to fudge it immediately :) Salutations, A bit late I kn

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-10-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > "All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply > with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers > policy." [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the > policy.) I have now

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread T.C. Hollingsworth
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Appearance is something we'd want to enforce if it were actually done, > but I get the impression the Qt variant of Adwaita isn't actually > written yet. There's no need for such a thing. Qt renders apps with native GTK widgets when run i

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > "All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply > with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers > policy." [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the > policy.) So Beta TC

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > That sounds workable, so long as someone's actually making sure we > *do* > comply with those. Has anyone checked that yet? I'd rather not throw > it > in the criteria and then have to fudge it immediately :) I don't think all apps are cu

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 09:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > "All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply > > with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers > > policy." [1] (This is

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 20:41 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > "All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply > with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers > policy." [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the > policy.) That sound

Re: Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-29 Thread Michael Catanzaro
"All applications installed by default in Fedora Workstation must comply with each MUST and MUST NOT guideline in the Applications and Launchers policy." [1] (This is already mentioned at the very bottom of the policy.) On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 17:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > We don't really ha

Beta / Final release criteria for Workstation

2014-09-29 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks. I wanted to ask if you envisage a need for release criteria for Workstation at Beta (or Final) over and above those that already exist for 'desktop' stuff. Areas I notice: SSSD is listed in the tech spec. We have server-side requirements for FreeIPA in the Server product; do we want to