Daniel J Walsh writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/06/2011 03:08 AM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Janina Sajka wrote:
> >
> >> Janina Sajka writes:
> >>> I can't be the only one who's run into this?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> My procmail setup has not change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2011 03:08 AM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Janina Sajka wrote:
>
>> Janina Sajka writes:
>>> I can't be the only one who's run into this?
>>>
>>>
>>> My procmail setup has not changed fundamentally in well over a
>>> decade. I
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Janina Sajka writes:
>> I can't be the only one who's run into this?
>>
>>
>> My procmail setup has not changed fundamentally in well over a decade. I
>> use INCLUDERC directives in my ~/.procmailrc so that I can keep my
>> various recipies in separate fil
Janina Sajka writes:
> I can't be the only one who's run into this?
>
>
> My procmail setup has not changed fundamentally in well over a decade. I
> use INCLUDERC directives in my ~/.procmailrc so that I can keep my
> various recipies in separate files. It's worked perfectly well forever
> -- unt
I can't be the only one who's run into this?
My procmail setup has not changed fundamentally in well over a decade. I
use INCLUDERC directives in my ~/.procmailrc so that I can keep my
various recipies in separate files. It's worked perfectly well forever
-- until my install of Tuesday's F-16 bet
