On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 22:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:26 +0530, Sawrub wrote:
> > On 10/29/2010 01:11 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote:
> > > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have
> >
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:41 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> conditions for joining the group. If you confirm, via the same ticket
> and via this list, that you have satisfied the requirements, then the
> mentor will sponsor your request once an application to join the
That was a type and I left a wor
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Sawrub wrote:
> Ok thats too is fine, so how can i join/ be a member of proven testers.
> Filing a ticket as mentioned http://tinyurl.com/2czpxok does not seem to
> work [please change if not applicable ].
> Besides all please approve my request for the proven tes
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:26 +0530, Sawrub wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 01:11 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote:
> > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have
> > > both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes
On 10/29/2010 01:11 AM, James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote:
AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have
both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes.
That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:20 -0400, TK009 wrote:
> +1 as someone how has applied for that group in the past only to find
> out no riding lessons, no pony.
*rides by on his flying unicorn*
don't worry, there's nothing at all special about the qa group. Just
like James says, it's just useless.
*ri
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:17 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400,
>> James Laska wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote:
>> > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400,
> James Laska wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote:
> > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have
> > > both triagers, fedorabugs and prove
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400,
James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote:
> > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have
> > both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes.
>
> That's correct. Iarly lists th
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote:
> AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have
> both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes.
That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA FAS groups.
Any other groups are ignored /
AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have both
triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes.
- -
iarlyy selbir
:wq!
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Sawrub wrote:
> I just noticed that i'm still not a member of 'Fedora QA Group' and my
> request s
I just noticed that i'm still not a member of 'Fedora QA Group' and my
request stands Unapproved. Please approve my request for the same. A
brief summary about me : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sawrub
--
Saurabh Sharma
Linux user number: 490644
http://sawrub-blog.blogspot.com/
Open yo
12 matches
Mail list logo
