Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned

2013-12-09 Thread Bruno Medeiros
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a

Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned

2013-12-07 Thread Bruno Medeiros
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users will see an error

Re: systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned

2013-12-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote: On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora

systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned

2013-12-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings. systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last night (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release). However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users will see an error about the package not being signed. This has already been corrected and