--Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:41 AM
To: Cavetex
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver
I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver
committee to be discussed at the Januar
I second, third, and fourth that motion.
See y'all there!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Charles Goldsmith [mailto:wo...@justfamily.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:41 AM
To: Cavetex
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] all-electronic Texas Caver
I motion to table this discussio
Oh yeah, I forgot that part of it :) Sorry, multi-tasking here at work.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM, ellie :) wrote:
> Fuck Yeah! I was hoping you would say "Silence is consent", but its perfect.
> I hope you get a good response.
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Charles Goldsmith
> wr
Fuck Yeah! I was hoping you would say "Silence is consent", but its perfect.
I hope you get a good response.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Charles Goldsmith wrote:
> I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver
> committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meet
I motion to table this discussion and refer it to the Free Texas Caver
committee to be discussed at the January 10th TSA meeting where
registered members present can vote for a majority.
Charles
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Mixon Bill wrote:
> While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texa
While I'm in favor of paper copies of the Texas Caver as it presently
exists, it is worth pointing out some advantages of going the route of
making it _completely_ on the Web, with no paper distribution at all.
1) There would be virtually no costs in money of publishing.
2) Therefore it could
