-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/19/2005 8:56 AM, Javier Aravena wrote:
> I don't think gtk will be gnome toolkit before topaz (or the same,
> before it hits 3.0), I think people will have no trouble working in gtk2
> (as in gimp toolkit 2) once that happens. Remember Gnome won't
Jeff Franks wrote:
> I have modified the CSS file to display a narrower sidebar. Its width is
> now 14em instead of 16em. Here are a couple of things you should keep in
> mind when you look at the template.
>
> Firstly, the website does display properly in Konqueror, Opera and
> Firefox 1.5b1.
Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> Hey Erik,
>
> Erik Harrison schrieb:
>
>>Very nice design, and well done indeed.
>>
>>However, is it possible to cut down on the size of the sidebar a few
>>pixels.
>
>
> Pixels? No. See my answer to Yo'av's post.
I think you need to specify that small fonts should be
Hi again,
I have modified the CSS file to display a narrower sidebar. Its width is
now 14em instead of 16em. Here are a couple of things you should keep in
mind when you look at the template.
Firstly, the website does display properly in Konqueror, Opera and
Firefox 1.5b1. As soon as I can get
Jari Rahkonen wrote:
>Anders Aagaard wrote:
>
>
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>>
>If you're using firefox 1.0.x, this might be due to a known problem with
>gtk2 builds of the browser and divs with the css property 'overflow' set
>to 'auto'. I can't be bothered to check the style sheet right now to make
>s
Yo'av Moshe wrote:
>Very nice looking, but 2 things -
>
>1. I'm having the same problem as Anders.
>2. It feels like the sidebar is too wide. Seems like 25%, which is way
>too much in my opinion.
>
>
>
This can be changed... but it is roughly the same size as the Xfce
sidebar. The only differen
Apparently this is not only a Firefox problem, since I'm a Mozilla
user and also suffering from the same bug.
Epiphany behaves the same.
a Gecko bug.
Yo'av.
On 9/19/05, Jari Rahkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anders Aagaard wrote:
>
> > Jeff Franks wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've bee
I don't know, but here I have quite a bit more than the size needed
for seeing the text without warping. Maybe there's a lot of
padding-right given on the sidebar's text?
Sorry for my language, English isn't my first language.
Yo'av.
On 9/19/05, Jannis Pohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Anders Aagaard wrote:
> Jeff Franks wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been working hard for the past three weeks on my proposal for the
>> Thunar web site. Rather than risk the discussion becoming an off topic I
>> collaborated with Jannis Pohlmann off-list to nut out the technical
>> XHMTL/CSS detai
Hey,
Henrik Andersen schrieb:
> On 19/09/05, Jeff Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I've been working hard for the past three weeks on my proposal for the
>>Thunar web site. Rather than risk the discussion becoming an off topic I
>>collaborated with Jannis Pohlmann off-list to nu
Hey Erik,
Erik Harrison schrieb:
> Very nice design, and well done indeed.
>
> However, is it possible to cut down on the size of the sidebar a few
> pixels.
Pixels? No. See my answer to Yo'av's post.
- Jannis
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@x
Hi,
Yo'av Moshe schrieb:
> Very nice looking, but 2 things -
>
> 1. I'm having the same problem as Anders.
Oh, yes. I didn't look into the latest internals of the stylesheet, but
the reason might be rather easy to find. Let's wait for what Jeff says.
> 2. It feels like the sidebar is too wide.
On 19/09/05, Jeff Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working hard for the past three weeks on my proposal for the
> Thunar web site. Rather than risk the discussion becoming an off topic I
> collaborated with Jannis Pohlmann off-list to nut out the technical
> XHMTL/CSS deta
Very nice design, and well done indeed.
However, is it possible to cut down on the size of the sidebar a few
pixels. I initially thought that I need to side scroll, because the
ratios of sidebar to main content is a little higher than the average.
My brain just assumed before I could look that the
Very nice looking, but 2 things -
1. I'm having the same problem as Anders.
2. It feels like the sidebar is too wide. Seems like 25%, which is way
too much in my opinion.
Other than that - I think it's very nice, if everyone will agree on
that I'l fix the old phpBB2 theme.
Yo'av.
On 9/19/05, An
Jeff Franks wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working hard for the past three weeks on my proposal for the
> Thunar web site. Rather than risk the discussion becoming an off topic I
> collaborated with Jannis Pohlmann off-list to nut out the technical
> XHMTL/CSS details, to ensure the website wou
Hi all,
I've been working hard for the past three weeks on my proposal for the
Thunar web site. Rather than risk the discussion becoming an off topic I
collaborated with Jannis Pohlmann off-list to nut out the technical
XHMTL/CSS details, to ensure the website would be standards compliant.
Ach
I don't think gtk will be gnome toolkit before topaz (or the same,
before it hits 3.0), I think people will have no trouble working in
gtk2 (as in gimp toolkit 2) once that happens. Remember Gnome won't
break backwards-compatibility before topaz (I believe that's the only
reason bonobo is still bon
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> This is pretty old news. GLib already contains some optimizations (like
> G_PARAM_STATIC_NAME, etc.). There are a lot of places throughout GTK/GDK
> where you could actually save memory (also cairo comes to mind now), but
> it's really not that trivial: Most of this (so cal
Anders Aagaard wrote:
> Hi
>
> I noticed http://live.gnome.org/MemoryReduction, and I remember you
> talking about gnome (nautilus in particular)'s ridiculous memory usage.
> I'm sure they would apriciate some constructive criticism ;), It seems
> they are also working on gtk, which would help xf
20 matches
Mail list logo
