[tw] Re: Is anybody on this group an active Genealogist?

2017-04-23 Thread Richard Evans
Thank you, Josiah, I am only using TiddlyWiki as a tool to capture research about an individual. I leave the relationships to the genealogical program I use. Also, like you, I do not have the skills to incorporate a Javascript library. It sounds fascinating, but it is too far outside my

[tw] Re: Is anybody on this group an active Genealogist?

2017-04-22 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
A small footnote, Richard, before I forget. The kind of genealogical mapping/dataering you refer to ... "TiddlyWiki to aid in guiding, documenting and planning the research on an > individual." > Is, exactly what anthropologist's do. They look at relationships in relation an individual. In

[tw] Re: Is anybody on this group an active Genealogist?

2017-04-21 Thread Richard Evans
I would very much like to compare notes with your wife. Please ask her to contact me. On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 5:20:54 PM UTC+1, codacoder...@outlook.com wrote: > > > > On Thursday, April 20, 2017 at 5:37:08 PM UTC-5, Richard Evans wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> First of all I want to thank you all

[tw] Re: Is anybody on this group an active Genealogist?

2017-04-21 Thread codacodercodacoder
On Thursday, April 20, 2017 at 5:37:08 PM UTC-5, Richard Evans wrote: > > Hi, > > First of all I want to thank you all for replying. Though I most of you > seem to have jumped to the conclusion, that I am trying to replace > genealogical programs. I am not. In fact, I believe I have

[tw] Re: Is anybody on this group an active Genealogist?

2017-04-20 Thread Richard Evans
Hi, First of all I want to thank you all for replying. Though I most of you seem to have jumped to the conclusion I am trying to replace genealogical programs. I am not. In fact, I think I have identified, a gap in the market. I would direct you to the phrase I used in my initial post:

[tw] Re: Is anybody on this group an active Genealogist?

2017-04-20 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Mark S. I agree for massive datasets that I doubt there is any point in going TW since the deep genealogy stuff has been done infinitely already and has a defined structure. For what *anthropologists* and *linguists* need it might actually be very good. They are not interested per se

[tw] Re: Is anybody on this group an active Genealogist?

2017-04-20 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
Hello, Wikipedia lists 22 genealogical software packages, and I'm sure it's not exhaustive. Another site lists 7 free software packages for genealogy. When you look at the standard feature set, you see a lot of work went into developing any one of these. So, I'm curious to know what you would