On Fri, 29 May 2009 15:12:22 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>
> Reality sucks :-( I've no objection to comitting this doc though
Hopefully we can reduce the suckiness of reality with all of this
common documentation. :)
> > What server was it that mishandled this sequence?
>
> It was in th
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:37:41AM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009 17:00:56 +0100
> "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > > This thread seems to have died off.
> > >
> > > Daniel, do you feel that your concerns have
On Thu, 28 May 2009 17:00:56 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > This thread seems to have died off.
> >
> > Daniel, do you feel that your concerns have been addressed, or do we
> > need more discussion?
>
> I'm fine with the pr
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> This thread seems to have died off.
>
> Daniel, do you feel that your concerns have been addressed, or do we
> need more discussion?
I'm fine with the principle that key repeat should be generated client
side, but I'm not convinced
On Mon, 11 May 2009 13:59:51 +0200
Pierre Ossman wrote:
> This thread seems to have died off.
>
> Daniel, do you feel that your concerns have been addressed, or do we
> need more discussion?
>
*ping*
--
Pierre OssmanOpenSource-based Thin Client Technology
System Developer
This thread seems to have died off.
Daniel, do you feel that your concerns have been addressed, or do we
need more discussion?
Rgds
--
Pierre OssmanOpenSource-based Thin Client Technology
System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00
Cendio ABWeb: http://www.cen
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:43:53 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > There exists client that send repeated "down" events on automatic key
> > repeats, and those that send pairs of "up" and "down". Usually this
> > behaviour depends o
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
It is also not, in general, possible to mandate that key repeat
takes place on the client. Where VNC the server is attached to
a X server / other desktop service, it might be possible to disable
server side repeat, but in the case of a VNC server at
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 06:52:10PM +0200, Peter ?strand wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
>> It is also not, in general, possible to mandate that key repeat
>> takes place on the client. Where VNC the server is attached to
>> a X server / other desktop service, it might be p
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
It is also not, in general, possible to mandate that key repeat
takes place on the client. Where VNC the server is attached to
a X server / other desktop service, it might be possible to disable
server side repeat, but in the case of a VNC server at
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:44:56PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> There exists client that send repeated "down" events on automatic key
> repeats, and those that send pairs of "up" and "down". Usually this
> behaviour depends on the platform on which the client runs.
>
> Since only the repeated "do
Den 2009-04-30 14:44 skrev Pierre Ossman:
> There exists client that send repeated "down" events on automatic key
> repeats, and those that send pairs of "up" and "down". Usually this
> behaviour depends on the platform on which the client runs.
>
> Since only the repeated "down" case allows the s
There exists client that send repeated "down" events on automatic key
repeats, and those that send pairs of "up" and "down". Usually this
behaviour depends on the platform on which the client runs.
Since only the repeated "down" case allows the server to tell the
difference between automatic and m
13 matches
Mail list logo
