> Subject: ARLB010 Spring 2008 W1AW Frequency Measuring Test Set
> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 13:33:09 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: Subscribed ARRL Members:;
> From: "ARRL Web site" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> SB QST @ ARL $ARLB010
> ARLB010 Spring 2008 W1AW Frequency Measuring Test Set
>
> ZCZC
> Also, are the "group" purchase Thunderbolts new or pulled from equipment?
Pulled from equipment that was never delivered. So that is
about as new as you can get.
/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www
I realize that the "group" purchase Thunderbolt's will come with a power
supply. I am interested, however, in what others are using for their
Thunderbolts as a PS, i.e. +12,-12,+5?
Does anyone know which DC-DC converter Trimble has used in the pictured T'Bolts?
Also, are the "group" purchase
I found those on e-Pay. I finally gave up om trying to get an answer to
my question (sent three times) so just bought one.
73, Dick, W1KSZ
-Original Message-
>From: Tom Van Baak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: May 18, 2008 9:39 PM
>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
>Sub
The T-E datasheet lists timing accuracy at +/-15nS (1 sigma), where did you
get the spec that says 20?
Also, the antenna connector on the T-E is a BNC, the old T has an F
connector.
Didier KO4BB
That data sheet does say 15. Some say 20 ! Perhaps ??? good question.
http://www.stepgps.com/docs/T
Phil,
The T-E datasheet lists timing accuracy at +/-15nS (1 sigma), where did you
get the spec that says 20?
Also, the antenna connector on the T-E is a BNC, the old T has an F
connector.
Didier KO4BB
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
;
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 3:49 AM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt EOL
> While the mini-T is obviously not the same, the -E version many be nothing
> more than a R
Hi Tom,
Not sure if Pb-free is the only change.
We received feedback from someone that is evaluating the Fury GPSDO to
replace the EOL Thunderbolt GPSDO in their application.
They looked at the T-Bolt, T-Bolt-E, Mini-T, and Fury (the single oven,
AT-cut, low-cost version - the double-oven
While the mini-T is obviously not the same, the -E version many be nothing more
than a RoHS compliant version of the original. I've seen many changes to
devices/assemblies in the past year or two, but when the smoke clears it's
nothing but a RoHS-related change. In fact, in many cases, there i
