[time-nuts] No Echo

2008-02-15 Thread Neville Michie
Sorry for the double mailing, I find it very disconcerting to not have my contributions sent back to me. I mail a response, but it seems not to have been sent, or there is a big delay. When I go to the archives I find it was sent but I did not get a copy. Even when I list myself under Cc. cheer

Re: [time-nuts] No Echo

2008-02-15 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Neville Michie said the following on 02/15/2008 05:14 PM: > Sorry for the double mailing, > I find it very disconcerting to not have my contributions sent back > to me. > I mail a response, but it seems not to have been sent, or there is a > big delay. > When I go to the archives I find it was

Re: [time-nuts] No Echo

2008-02-15 Thread Sylvain RICHARD
Neville Michie wrote: > Sorry for the double mailing, > I find it very disconcerting to not have my contributions sent back > to me. > I mail a response, but it seems not to have been sent, or there is a > big delay. > When I go to the archives I find it was sent but I did not get a copy. > Eve

Re: [time-nuts] No Echo

2008-02-22 Thread Robert Vassar
In Apple Mail use "View -> Message -> Long Headers". FWIW Here's the relevant section on Sylvain's reply: Received: from febo.com (meow.febo.com [24.123.66.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailhost.rob-vassar.com (Postfix)

Re: [time-nuts] No Echo

2008-02-23 Thread Sylvain RICHARD
Robert Vassar wrote: > In Apple Mail use "View -> Message -> Long Headers". > Thanks for the heads up. Here is the result for Robert's message: Received: (qmail 816 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2008 22:43:10 - Received: from 24.123.66.139 (HELO febo.com) (24.123.66.139) by mrelay3-1.free

Re: [time-nuts] No Echo

2008-02-23 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
Sylvain RICHARD said the following on 02/23/2008 08:59 AM: > In my case, most of the delay comes from my ISP (free.fr). Neville, just > do the same on your machine. > Please note that the usual caveat (is your server time set correctly?) > does not apply our case. There is also some queuing del

Re: [time-nuts] No Echo

2008-02-23 Thread Robert Vassar
On Feb 23, 2008, at 8:31 AM, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > Sylvain RICHARD said the following on 02/23/2008 08:59 AM: > >> >> Please note that the usual caveat (is your server time set >> correctly?) >> does not apply our case. > Just to tie off my end, the originating machine for that message

Re: [time-nuts] No Echo

2008-02-23 Thread Matthew Smith
Quoth Robert Vassar at 2008-02-24 02:31... > ... However, the first timestamp on the SMTP > envelope is generated by linode.rob-vassar.com, which is a virtual > server. It is a UML Linux instance that in effect runs as a large > program on a huge shared Linux server in a co-lo facility. It re