Michael Matz wrote:
|On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|I think this leaks memory when opath contains a string already. pbuf is
Indeed, pbuf comes from copy_linker_arg(), i sublimely overlooked
it, but indeed see now. I'm sorry.
--steffen
commit 2a28638 (HEAD -> refs/heads/i)
Au
Hi,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Bäh!
> Take this one, please, the other one deleted an option.
> Ciao!
I think this leaks memory when opath contains a string already. pbuf is
allocated memory, you free the opath, copy pbuf into npath, but then leak
pbuf itself (it's not leak
Bäh!
Take this one, please, the other one deleted an option.
Ciao!
--steffen
commit 2b59c82 (HEAD -> refs/heads/i)
Author: Steffen (Daode) Nurpmeso
AuthorDate: 2016-06-04 15:48:15 +0200
Commit: Steffen (Daode) Nurpmeso
CommitDate: 2016-06-06 13:59:30 +0200
Allow multiple -rpath link
Sorry, forgot the diff:
--steffen
commit db263ba (HEAD -> refs/heads/i)
Author: Steffen (Daode) Nurpmeso
AuthorDate: 2016-06-04 15:48:15 +0200
Commit: Steffen (Daode) Nurpmeso
CommitDate: 2016-06-06 13:37:03 +0200
Allow multiple -rpath linker arguments
---
libtcc.c | 26 +++
Hello.
David Mertens wrote:
|Also, I am not sure what others think about the first line in which y\
|ou declare two integers and initialize them with the return values of\
| function
|calls. I guess that's fine, but I don't see it often in the codebase.\
| @Everyone, do we have a coding sta
Hi,
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, David Mertens wrote:
Nice. I am not very familiar with this part of tcc, but I noticed the
use of ':' as a path separator. Is this the path separator used across
all platforms?
Yes. On all those that support DT_RPATH or DT_RUNPATH, which is an
ELFism ...
In parti
Nice. I am not very familiar with this part of tcc, but I noticed the use
of ':' as a path separator. Is this the path separator used across all
platforms? In particular, what about Windows?
Also, I am not sure what others think about the first line in which you
declare two integers and initialize
Hi!
Pretty stormy here, huh?
i wrote:
|Hello again!
|
|I have just recognized that i need to use -Wl,-rpath now (new
|So then, here we go:
| ?0[steffen@wales nail.git]$ readelf -d s-nail
| 0x000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [/usr/lib]
|This is still true for [mob:
Hello again!
I have just recognized that i need to use -Wl,-rpath now (new
layout for/with optional (hidden) packages in my ~/usr/opt/), so
great that tcc(1) does support this! (I always wondered why -L
isn't automatically taken over for this purpose, however, since it
is standardized and why sho
