Hi ,
I need to send more than 29 bytes for the application I am working on.
However, I do not want to increase the payload size so much that it will
reduce the throughput of the network. Is "29 bytes" found to give close
to optimal throughput? Are there any empirical/analytical studies that
s
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vinai
Sundaram
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 1:39 AM
To: tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: [Tinyos-help] Rationale for 29 bytes payload
Hi ,
I need to send more than 29 bytes for the application I am work
it
>> power automatically to save battery on motes that are sitting near each
>> other in a noiseless environment.
>>
>> I've attached several spreadsheets showing the packet throughput for
>> mica-
>> mote types with varying payload sizes. Noise was not a fa
ith varying payload sizes. Noise was not a factor in any of
these tests.
-david
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vinai
Sundaram
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 1:39 AM
To: tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: [Tinyos-help] Rationale for 29
ironment you plan to deploy in. If it's
>>>> indoors
>>>> with tight spacing, max out the payload. If it's outdoors on the
>>>> ground
>>>> with wider spacing, might as well keep the payload size pretty modest.
>>>>
>>>&
is 63/7 = 9.0. The overheads are
7/(29+7) = 20% and 7/(63+7) = 10%.
Chang
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vinai Sundaram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, April 22, 2006 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] Rati
e to accumulate.
-david
-Original Message-
From: Vinai Sundaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:47 PM
To: David Moss
Cc: tinyos-help@Millennium.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] Rationale for 29 bytes payload
Hi David,
Thank you for your response and the graph
On 4/21/06, Vinai Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to send more than 29 bytes for the application I am working on.
> However, I do not want to increase the payload size so much that it will
> reduce the throughput of the network. Is "29 bytes" found to give close
> to optimal throughput
*
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:07:13 -0700
From: "David Gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Tinyos-help] Rationale for 29 bytes payload
To: "Vinai Sundaram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: tin
On Apr 24, 2006, at 10:07 AM, David Gay wrote:
It's historical. The original TinyOS motes had a radio that was
controlled by software at the bit level, and somebody (Jason?) found
that 36 bytes/packet was a good place to be (maximise throughput,
minimise chance of packets getting lost because o
Hi,This is great to know! Apart from this topic there was also a discussion on April 7 on the maximum payload size that we could use up to 128 bytes for IEEE 802.15.4 radio compliant platform.
http://mail.millennium.berkeley.edu/pipermail/tinyos-help/2006-April/015912.htmlCould somebody shed some
11 matches
Mail list logo