Hi
One issue I would have with the article is the mention of 79,000 PAIRS of
articles with duplicate text, which gives an impression that appears to be
wildly out of line with the demonstrated instances of duplicate publication. I
think the large number is a product of at least two factors: (1
Don't miss the link to the apparent self-plagiarism database drawn from Medline
http://spore.vbi.vt.edu/dejavu/
It is astonishing the amount of this that appears to have been happening over
the years.
A student of mine came across a case essentially similar to those in that
database when he wa