Re: [34083,etc..] method of disabling cache

Does cache-control: private not achieve the correct behavior for you? Keith Remy Maucherat wrote: Keith Wannamaker wrote: I haven't heard anything from this, so I plan on replacing the three headers this code sets with a single cache-control: private header this weekend in tc 5.0 and 5.5. Make i

Re: [34083,etc..] method of disabling cache

Keith Wannamaker wrote: I haven't heard anything from this, so I plan on replacing the three headers this code sets with a single cache-control: private header this weekend in tc 5.0 and 5.5. Make it optional. Rémy - To unsubscri

Re: [34083,etc..] method of disabling cache

I haven't heard anything from this, so I plan on replacing the three headers this code sets with a single cache-control: private header this weekend in tc 5.0 and 5.5. Keith Keith Wannamaker wrote: Remy, what are your reasons for not using cache-control: private? We discovered some time ago that

[34083,etc..] method of disabling cache

Remy, what are your reasons for not using cache-control: private? We discovered some time ago that the Pragma: no-cache causes IE trouble when under ssl. Why wouldn't cache-control: private be sufficient? If we're enabling this behavior by default, it would make sense to use the most interoper