apache.org
Subject: Re: Array as context parameter
Litty Preeth yahoo.com> writes:
> Or u can use a comma separated list of strings and parse them using
> StringTokenizer.
That sounds better. It's surely more user friendly. But the chance of an
error during entering coma-separated val
Litty Preeth yahoo.com> writes:
> Or u can use a comma separated list of strings and
> parse them using StringTokenizer.
That sounds better. It's surely more user friendly. But the chance of an error
during entering coma-separated values is bigger. It's easy to forget about coma
or place dot.
Hi,
Or u can use a comma separated list of strings and
parse them using StringTokenizer.
With Regards,
Litty Preeth
--- Konrad Billewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I would like to pass an array to my application
> using inside
> . Manual says that only primitive types are
> available. But..
I would like to pass an array to my application using inside
. Manual says that only primitive types are available. But... I need
an
array.
How would you handle this problem? My only, little dummy idea is to do
something
like:
...
And get them using context.lookup() until exception.
Be
