RE: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties? On 6 Mar 2019, at 12:32, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote: Hi David, Thx and fully agree the wkt-issue! In att. I actua

Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> On Behalf Of dprice > Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2019 12:35 > To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> > Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties? > > Hi Michel, > > Just remembered that

Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

Hi Michel, Just remembered that the ISO 15926-12 ontology is available online, in case you would like to compare that with the OPM. https://standards.iso.org/iso/ts/15926/-12/ed-1/en/tech/ontology/ Note that there’s an “exampl

Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

FWIW saying “owl-wise not ok” is inaccurate. To be accurate you need to say "OWL DL (aka Direct Semantics)-wise not ok”. OWL Full (aka RDF-based Semantics) does not mind. If the intent is that a property like Height is a class (e.g. “2 metre” is the class with members being all things that are

Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

Yes, I agree. It is also important to understand the use cases to be supported by this model and how exactly you will implement them. For example: Why have Height as a class to begin with - if these resources will not carry any properties, could they be just literals? The statement regarding th

Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

What is your concern about OWL? When you say that prefUnit for a class is ‘m’, from either RDF or OWL perspective, you are not saying anything about the class members. You are saying something about the class itself as a resource, not about a set of resources that comprise it. If you mean it

Re: [topbraid-users] Classlevel properties?

Are you in an environment that prescribes OWL DL? If not, then stop working with one hand tied behind your back! If you indeed must stick to OWL DL, I have nothing to offer but my heartfelt sympathy! Richard > On 27 Feb 2019, at 09:05, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users > wrot