On 06/05/14 21:19, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:29:03PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote:
>> I'm interested in your work because the hidden service protocol
>> doesn't seem to perform very well for hidden services running on
>> mobile devices, which frequently lose network connec
On 06/05/14 22:07, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 06/05/14 15:29, Michael Rogers wrote:
>> I'm interested in your work because the hidden service protocol
>> doesn't seem to perform very well for hidden services running on
>> mobile devices, which frequently lose network connectivity. I wonder
>> i
On 06/05/14 15:29, Michael Rogers wrote:
> I'm interested in your work because the hidden service protocol
> doesn't seem to perform very well for hidden services running on
> mobile devices, which frequently lose network connectivity. I wonder
> if the situation can be improved by choosing introdu
On 06/05/14 20:13, Nicholas Hopper wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> On 03/05/14 11:21, George Kadianakis wrote:
On 08/10/13 06:52, Christopher Baines wrote:
In short, I modified tor such that:
- The services public key is used in the connection
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:29:03PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote:
> I'm interested in your work because the hidden service protocol
> doesn't seem to perform very well for hidden services running on
> mobile devices, which frequently lose network connectivity. I wonder
> if the situation can be impro
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 03/05/14 11:21, George Kadianakis wrote:
>>> On 08/10/13 06:52, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>> In short, I modified tor such that:
>>> - The services public key is used in the connection to introduction
>>> points (a return to the stat
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> I noticed that proposal 236 doesn't mention directory guards. (See
> proposal 207, implemented in Tor 0.2.4.) I think that we should
> consider retaining multiple directory guards while going to a single
> guard for multi-hop circuits.
...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Christopher,
I'm interested in your work because the hidden service protocol
doesn't seem to perform very well for hidden services running on
mobile devices, which frequently lose network connectivity. I wonder
if the situation can be improved by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon 05 May 2014 04:08:58 PM CEST, Nicolas Vigier wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Gunes Acar wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> And this looks like a very good start! If you think that's ready, I can
>>> merge your patch (fp_tests.patch) so we start running those te
