On 04/06/2017 09:13 AM, Jeremy Rand wrote:
> Hi Nick!
>
> Nick Mathewson:
>> Section 2.1 and elsewhere:
>
>> I suggest that we require all address suffixes to end with .onion;
>> other TLDs are not reserved like .onion is, and maybe we shouldn't
>> squat any we haven't squatted already.
>
> FW
>
> > I suggest that we require all address suffixes to end with .onion;
> > other TLDs are not reserved like .onion is, and maybe we shouldn't
> > squat any we haven't squatted already.
>
> FWIW it's not at all clear to me that this is a concern that IETF or
> ICANN will care about.
Hi.
My name
On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:44:03 +0100
Alec Muffett wrote:
> If I was in charge, I would say that we risk overthinking this, and it
> would be better to:
>
>- mandate use of fully DNS-compliant syntax, including but not
> limited to: acceptable max length, max label length, charset and
> compositi