> It's true, dropping the fingerprint is quite invasive and might break
> things. But that's why we're making plans now to make this transition
> as smooth as possible.
>
> However, I don't think that we can get away by just replacing the
> existing 20 byte long RSA key digest with a 20 byte long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/15 18:16, Damian Johnson wrote:
>>> Hi Karsten. Quick question: with the switchover are relay
>>> fingerprints going away? That is to say, server descriptors no
>>> longer have a...
>>>
>>> fingerprint D203 4DDF 1275 A234 4F66 9935 A3EF B908
>> Hi Karsten. Quick question: with the switchover are relay fingerprints
>> going away? That is to say, server descriptors no longer have a...
>>
>> fingerprint D203 4DDF 1275 A234 4F66 9935 A3EF B908 FFC7 AE9A
>>
>> ... line, and router status entries don't have it on their dir-source?
If not, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
Sebastian suggested to me in one of our last measurement team 1-1-1
task exchange rounds [0] to think about the following question:
Which measurement-related tools need work when relays switch from RSA
identities to ed25519 identities?
