This is unfortunate but we will not be deterred.
I would also go chargeback if notice you now give them
does not result in satisfied action by close Sunday. You paid
for a year based on some assurance, and did not receive.
Now in the future...
You plan was long and two part, partly confusing.
It
On 2015-02-25 11:35, Speak Freely wrote:
The Abuse department's rationale is as follows:
"Your account was suspended because 100% of your IPs are blacklisted on
multiples lists for Spam and other malicious activities.
This case is closed and this decision is final."
Speaking as an abuse desk l
On 02/25/2015 01:34 PM, ja...@icetor.is wrote:
> This++
Indeed!
And if you used PayPal, they may also help.
> On 02/25/2015 07:32 PM, Pascal wrote:
>> If you paid with a credit card, give them a choice: they can either
>> refund your money or you will initiate a chargeback. Either way you get
>
Hi man,
I will try to explain you how things got in wrong direction for you. OVH
don't lie, but they don't have best support that you can find around.
Anyway. Last 15-25 days a lot of attacks was made on French ISP's and
attacker used Tor IP list to do one part of his sick idea. One of my nodes
"i
OVH says no to Tor exits openly doesn't it?
> Quote:
> "Rest assure that, in case of an abuse, we will not terminate your
> account without notice. In fact we may not even terminate your VPS. You
> will receive a warning from our Abuse department giving you a choice to
> resolve the abuse case"
>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Speak Freely
wrote:
> Hello fellow relay runners,
>
> This morning OVH decided to kill 7 of my relays due to spamming, and
> block all access to all services. I ran the Reduced Exit policy for
> all of my relays.
I run one relay with OVH and one with DigitalOcean.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Chris Patti wrote:
> I'm having a similar situation. Linode issued a ToS violation because
> my linode on which I run a relay was a source of spam.
>
> Very strange because I had reject *.* (no exit) set in my torrc.
I have operated a non-exit relay on Linode for
I'm having a similar situation. Linode issued a ToS violation because
my linode on which I run a relay was a source of spam.
Very strange because I had reject *.* (no exit) set in my torrc.
Anyway I've had to give up and shut down FiatLux. Kind of a bummer, I
really enjoyed contributing to Tor.
This++
On 02/25/2015 07:32 PM, Pascal wrote:
> If you paid with a credit card, give them a choice: they can either
> refund your money or you will initiate a chargeback. Either way you get
> your money back, but with the chargeback you will probably get all of
> your money back instead of a prora
On February 25, 2015 8:21:32 PM Speak Freely wrote:
Hi,
Oh yes, my money is gone already. They have no interest in talking to me
anymore, as the decision was final. The Abuse department won't talk to
the Support department, and the abuse department won't talk to me.
Thats really sad. Spam ab
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Josef Stautner wrote:
> He said that he ran an reduced exit policy relay.
> Is portscanning even possible there?
Yes. The CMU Tor exit started with the reduced exit policy, and we
wound up additionally removing access to ports 22 and 23 (that is, ssh
and telnet)
If you paid with a credit card, give them a choice: they can either
refund your money or you will initiate a chargeback. Either way you get
your money back, but with the chargeback you will probably get all of
your money back instead of a prorated refund, they have to pay a fee,
and may have t
Oh yes, my money is gone already. They have no interest in talking to me
anymore, as the decision was final. The Abuse department won't talk to
the Support department, and the abuse department won't talk to me.
I'd be more inclined to think these spam assassin fellas/"evil doer
finders" just pars
On 02/25/2015 07:53 PM, Josef Stautner wrote:
> Is portscanning even possible there?
Should better used "service discovering" or "address range scanning" ?
I do observe at my exit relay since December last year, that few times per hour
between 500 and 5000 different ip address are "contacted" ov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
Sorry to hear this.
I want to setup a big node at Voxility, which is a good provider to
host Tor exits, maybe more of us can pool together financial resources
and make a big cluster. I have some offers from them if interested.
On 2/25/2015 8
He said that he ran an reduced exit policy relay.
Is portscanning even possible there?
Am 25.02.2015 um 19:51 schrieb Toralf Förster:
> On 02/25/2015 07:35 PM, Speak Freely wrote:
>> "Your account was suspended
> Does this really mean, that your money is lost already ?
> Often ISPs just plugged of
Hello Speak Freely,
that's not nice to hear.
Quote:
"Rest assure that, in case of an abuse, we will not terminate your
account without notice. In fact we may not even terminate your VPS. You
will receive a warning from our Abuse department giving you a choice to
resolve the abuse case"
Has OVH c
On 02/25/2015 07:35 PM, Speak Freely wrote:
> "Your account was suspended
Does this really mean, that your money is lost already ?
Often ISPs just plugged off a server from the network till "you solved the
problem"
> "your IPs are blacklisted on multiples lists for Spam and other malicious
> act
Hello fellow relay runners,
This morning OVH decided to kill 7 of my relays due to spamming, and
block all access to all services. I ran the Reduced Exit policy for all
of my relays.
Due to heightened concerns about this affecting other unrelated services
I have with OVH, I had to shut down the o
19 matches
Mail list logo
