On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:05:23AM +1100, teor wrote:
>
> > On 31 Jan 2017, at 20:21, nusenu wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > nusenu:
> >> tldr: would you send me your torrc if you aim to route IPv6 exit traffic
> >> and are in the list at the bottom with the third colmn set to NULL?
> >
> > instead of
Hey all,
I was wondering what the minimum exit policy was (wrt port 80 and 443) for
a Tor exit relay. I
cant find any documentation about the minimum exit policy.
Is it possible to have an exit relay exit only to a /16 or a /8 on port 80
and 443?
I've tried having an exit policy that allows exit
> I was wondering what the minimum exit policy was (wrt port 80 and 443) for a
> Tor exit relay.
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2294
"A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at least two of the ports
80, 443, and 6667 and allows exits to at least one /8
> On 3 Feb 2017, at 16:16, anondroid wrote:
>
> > I was wondering what the minimum exit policy was (wrt port 80 and 443) for
> > a Tor exit relay.
>
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2294
>
> "A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at least two of the
"iff" is shorthand for "if and only if", as opposed to "if [and maybe
otherwise]"
On 02/03/2017 12:16 AM, anondroid wrote:
>> I was wondering what the minimum exit policy was (wrt port 80 and 443) for a
>> Tor exit relay.
>
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2294
>
>
On January 31, 2017 12:17:00 AM PST, fr33d0m4all wrote:
>Hi,
>this is not really a Tor issue, but I'd like to know if there is
>someone
>else like me that is having problems upgrading his Tor installation to
>the latest version on its Raspberry (running Raspbian based on Debian
>Jessie):
Post