Good day all -
Coming up on day 3 of my tor relay, "SpinnerDolphin1". Per the metrics
page is showing "Dir Address none", but I have a DirPort defined (as nyx
reports), and opened.
Is this just something that won't be activated until later in my spin-up
cycle?
I have a 100/100 mbit connec
, with an observed speed of 5 MB/s (only a few days into the guard
ramp-up phase)
Seeing about 20 connected clients on the bridge, which is advertising
2.2 MiB/s per the metrics page. R/W rates around around 150k per that
same page, about 1/4th of the average on the guard relay.
Thoughts
What is this? Should I allow the external world access to the specified
port?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Note that any dns caching software would help, unbound is just one
popular one. dnsmasq is another. In fact, if you wanted to, you could
use the full bind package and configure it for caching and forwarding,
although that would be a bit of overkill. Once you install caching
software, make su
r
caching server would continue to respond with the wrong address until
the entry expired.
So I'd say "Not really". Hope the above explains why...
On 4/9/2022 7:05 PM, onion...@riseup.net wrote:
Does Cash DNS give some advantages in safety?
On 2022-04-08 08:06, Thoughts wro
Two suggestions:
1) Run speedtest (https://www.speedtest.net) from behind your firewall
and verify your actual bandwidth (or at least get a good approximation
).
2) Check the brand of NIC in your current machine. Intel NICs are
reportedly much more efficient than RealTek for handling larg
For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum?
Running on a quad core and recently saw a message indicating I had
insufficient CPU power to support the desired number of connections...
Thanks,
Kevin
___
tor-relays mailing list
core and about 12% of a second (for a total of 112/4 = 28% of the
system).
On 5/27/2022 12:55 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2022 19:31:41 -0500
Thoughts wrote:
For a non-exit relay, is "NumCPUs 2" still the recommended maximum?
Running on a quad core and recently saw a mes
rst, 40.3
observered) over my gigabit ISP connection. Speedtest shows the
performing within acceptable parameters.
So contemplating what I can do, since this is bothersome. I've come up
with a few alternatives, and curious about your thoughts:
1) Do some type of connection limiting at
Perhaps a related data point: per nyx I'm currently seeing about 20K
incoming connections but only 3.3K outbound. Shouldn't those be about
the same given I'm running a non-exit middle node?
On 7/27/2022 3:12 PM, Thoughts wrote:
Hi all - I've been running a TOR non-ex
Hi all -
Running a bridge, and per some stats I saw earlier Moat seems to be the
most popular distribution method.
Just curious is something else is recommended? Some seem less secure
than others, but I don't know the methods used to prevent abuse.
Would appreciate guidance.
Cheers,
Kevi
11 matches
Mail list logo