Hello all,
for somewhat over a year now I run a Tor relay on my router. The router
in turn is running OpenWRT. It's this one:
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/A52C51551F3BD6A68E778720E02B53303F014EB2
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A52C51551F3BD6A68E778720E02B53303F014EB2
Not much, bu
On 01/06/2016 06:11 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Not much, but let it be one of my small shares for improving humanity
You probably didn't save the keys in /var/lib/tor, so you set up a new
relay and the old one isn't running. Here's your new relay:
https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/C1B80BA2D97C3
Am 06.01.2016 um 20:22 schrieb Jesse V:
> On 01/06/2016 06:11 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
>> Not much, but let it be one of my small shares for improving humanity
>
> You probably didn't save the keys in /var/lib/tor, so you set up a new
> relay and the old one isn't running.
Thanks, Jesse, looks li
On 01/06/2016 11:02 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
> They might argue that an identity should go into /etc/, which is backed
> up by default, but let's see.
Your counter-argument is that /etc is for configuration files, not data
files. /var/lib/tor is the correct place for keys per the Unix
filesystem s
Is there really a reason to continue running this relay, even as a bridge?
It has a consensus weight of 9. Before the upgrade and subsequent
fingerprint reset, it was only at cw 16. The mean middle probability
fraction was 0.000103%. The mean on the read/write was less than half a
kilobyte per seco
> On 8 Jan 2016, at 16:26, Green Dream wrote:
>
> Is there really a reason to continue running this relay, even as a bridge? It
> has a consensus weight of 9. Before the upgrade and subsequent fingerprint
> reset, it was only at cw 16. The mean middle probability fraction was
> 0.000103%. The
Am 08.01.2016 um 07:33 schrieb Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
> What matters is the bandwidth it can contribute to censored users.
> The advertised bandwidth is 100KB/s, which is somewhat low for a bridge.
> As far as I recall, 250KB/s is considered a good minimum for a bridge.
Yes, I'm aware of this "r
> On 8 Jan 2016, at 21:17, Markus Hitter wrote:
>
> Am 08.01.2016 um 07:33 schrieb Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
>> What matters is the bandwidth it can contribute to censored users.
>> The advertised bandwidth is 100KB/s, which is somewhat low for a bridge.
>> As far as I recall, 250KB/s is consider