Hi list,
I was looking for suggestions/discussion on very conservative policies
for an exit relay. I run a relay now that is "reject *:*" and I wanted
to open up a few exit ports. I don't want to open up major ports due to
potential abuse issues. My server host states that, although they do
allow
This is a good place to start:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 5:57pm, "Stephen R Guglielmo"
said:
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://list
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo
wrote:
"safe":
> This would be my first time running an exit relay and I'd be happy to
> hear advice and suggestions!
According to the spec, your relay will never gain the exit flag
without 2/3 of 80, 443, 6667.
"Exit" -- A router is calle
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:21:05 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo
> wrote:
> "safe":
>
> > This would be my first time running an exit relay and I'd be happy
> > to hear advice and suggestions!
>
> According to the spec, your relay will never gain th
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:21:05 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> According to the spec, your relay will never gain the exit flag
> without 2/3 of 80, 443, 6667.
>
>"Exit" -- A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at
>least two of the ports 80, 443, and 6667 and allows exits to at
>
On 11.02.2015 00:21, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo
> According to the spec, your relay will never gain the exit flag
> without 2/3 of 80, 443, 6667.
>
>"Exit" -- A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at
>least two of the ports 80,
Hey Stephen,
I'm a relatively new operator, and I run over a half dozen Reduced Exit
relays and a few middle relays.
Abuse complaints shouldn't be common coming from IRC - the main culprits
for complaints are DMCA and related for alleged IP (Intellectual
Property) theft. That would be your t
On 02/11/2015 12:06 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
> This is a good place to start:
>
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy
+1
But even with the reduced policy I was spammed w/ DCMA emails 12 hours after I
installed and configured my Tor relay as an exit.
My strateg
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo
> wrote:
> "safe":
>
>> This would be my first time running an exit relay and I'd be happy to
>> hear advice and suggestions!
>
> According to the spec, your relay will never gain the exit
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:02am, "Chris Patti" said:
[snip]
> I tried running an exit for a bit and it lasted a few weeks before
> some brainless wonder hijacked someone's Gmail with my exit, so I had
> to pull it down and go relay only.
Me too. I dearly wish there a way to block webmail w
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:02:45AM -0500, Chris Patti wrote:
> I tried running an exit for a bit and it lasted a few weeks before
> some brainless wonder hijacked someone's Gmail with my exit, so I had
> to pull it down and go relay only.
Even worse (or maybe better), this sort of thing happens wh
Thanks for that Roger, it's a valid point. How do they simultaneously
protect the rights of their actual users while warning against all the
bad actors that feel the need to defecate all over such an important
service (Tor, that is :).
Part of me thinks that some kind of system like the way car i
On 02/18/2015 09:01 AM, Chris Patti wrote:
Bleah.
Pesky humans:)
Yes, it's always the problem of fitting imperfect components into a
perfect system that ruins everyone's day. :P
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://li
13 matches
Mail list logo
