-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
> Does it help Tor users if I start a Tor server running in or
> near any particular country or city? For example, in or near
> countries with intrusive domestic surveillance; countries with no
> other Tor servers; a city along a particular cable (
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 08:07:20AM -0500, joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote 0.4K bytes
in 12 lines about:
: On 8/24/2011 7:03 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
: >I've looked all over. Where can full release notes / change logs
: >be found for latest releases of TBB (alpha, beta or stable). All
: >I've found is bri
On 8/24/2011 7:03 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I've looked all over. Where can full release notes / change logs be
found for latest releases of TBB (alpha, beta or stable). All I've
found is brief summaries of main items.
Thanks.
No official release / changes notes for TBB & Tor?
___
On 8/27/2011 8:32 AM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 08:07:20AM -0500, joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote 0.4K bytes
in 12 lines about:
: On 8/24/2011 7:03 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
:>I've looked all over. Where can full release notes / change logs
:>be found for latest releases of TBB
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:14:39AM -0500, joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote 1.3K bytes
in 33 lines about:
: Don't find a readme or changelog for TBB 2.2.31-1a. All I find is
: on the blog- https://blog.torproject.org/blog/ , shown below. Are
: these all the changes from previous release?
You are right
Does it also mean that new stable Tor Browser with Firefox 6 will be
released soon? I really hope so :)
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Tor 0.2.2.31-rc is the second and final release candidate for the Tor
> 0.2.2.x series.
>
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-firefox-6
_
On 8/27/2011 11:14 AM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 09:14:39AM -0500, joebtfs...@gmx.com wrote 1.3K bytes
in 33 lines about:
: Don't find a readme or changelog for TBB 2.2.31-1a. All I find is
: on the blog- https://blog.torproject.org/blog/ , shown below. Are
: these
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Martin Fick wrote:
> ...
> Since such discussions are generally likely to be
> highly opinion based, it would help if you gave
> technical reasons for your opinions.
there's a huge volume of history spanning years of research on this
subject in both this mailing l
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:12 PM, coderman wrote:
> ... the very design trade offs they make to
> support larger numbers of contains per host directly reduce the
> networking performance and capacity of any singular container/vm.
note that design trade-offs in favor of speed also reduce the secur
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 05:05:06PM -0400, Advrk Aplmrkt wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been running a Tor relay for almost 5 days now and it works great!
> Unfortunately, I rebooted my server (which is running Tor) today, and
> when I do "service tor status", I get the following:
>
> PID file (/var/run/to
On 27 August 2011 17:22, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 05:05:06PM -0400, Advrk Aplmrkt wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I've been running a Tor relay for almost 5 days now and it works great!
>> Unfortunately, I rebooted my server (which is running Tor) today, and
>> when I do "service tor
Hello,
I've been running a Tor relay for almost 5 days now and it works great!
Unfortunately, I rebooted my server (which is running Tor) today, and
when I do "service tor status", I get the following:
PID file (/var/run/tor/tor.pid) present, but tor (1914) not running
I tried:
(1) Rebooting the
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:12, coderman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Martin Fick wrote:
> > ...
> > Both of your preferred solutions will have much
> > higher performance overheads than any container
> > like solution (OpenVz, Vserver, lxc...).
>
> concurrent number of open sockets.
13 matches
Mail list logo
