Hello List,
I am experiencing a strange problem for about two weeks or so.
I am using GNU/Liux (Debian 6 x86-64) and Tor 0.2.2.35 built from source.
I forward all my tcp traffic and udp traffic on port 53 to my tor instance
via netfilter.
So here is my problem: whenever I do DNS lookup via gli
hello
I am using the instructions on http://pastebin.com/09A1WgXc to set up an
obfuscated Tor bridge. I get this far:
/obfsproxy$ sudo /etc/init.d/tor restart
ABORTED: Tor configuration invalid:
Feb 14 19:11:38.039 [notice] Tor v0.2.2.35 (git-73ff13ab3cc9570d). This
is experimental software.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:43:44AM -0500, douglastskill...@lavabit.com wrote:
> 1 0.00192.168.178.30 127.0.0.1 DNS Standard query
> A torproject.org
> 2 0.27192.168.178.30 127.0.0.1 DNS Standard query
> torproject.org
> 3 0.000155
On 14/02/12 09:04, Anne Magarey wrote:
> hello
> I am using the instructions on http://pastebin.com/09A1WgXc to set up
> an obfuscated Tor bridge. I get this far:
>
>
> /obfsproxy$ sudo /etc/init.d/tor restart
> ABORTED: Tor configuration invalid:
> Feb 14 19:11:38.039 [notice] Tor v0.2.2.35 (git-7
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:50:01AM +0100, Alexander Schrijver wrote:
> The IP you're sending to and the IP you're receiving form don't match. The
> glibc stub resolver probably trashes these.
Actually, the UDP datagram probably never gets received by the stub resolver,
the OS trashes it since no o
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:34:06PM +1030, Anne Magarey wrote:
> I am using the instructions on http://pastebin.com/09A1WgXc to set up
> an obfuscated Tor bridge. I get this far:
>
>
> /obfsproxy$ sudo /etc/init.d/tor restart
> ABORTED: Tor configuration invalid:
> Feb 14 19:11:38.039 [notice] Tor
Unfortunately that did not work for me. Thank you for your help.
On 14/02/12 19:42, Andy Dixon wrote:
On 14/02/12 09:04, Anne Magarey wrote:
hello
I am using the instructions on http://pastebin.com/09A1WgXc to set up
an obfuscated Tor bridge. I get this far:
/obfsproxy$ sudo /etc/init.d/tor r
Anne Magarey writes:
> Unfortunately that did not work for me. Thank you for your help.
Could you have several versions of tor installed?
> On 14/02/12 19:42, Andy Dixon wrote:
>> On 14/02/12 09:04, Anne Magarey wrote:
>>> Feb 14 19:11:38.039 [notice] Tor v0.2.2.35 (git-73ff13ab3cc9570d).
Doe
Thanks everyone. It's done. I'm pleased.
anne
On 14/02/12 21:02, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
Anne Magarey writes:
Unfortunately that did not work for me. Thank you for your help.
Could you have several versions of tor installed?
On 14/02/12 19:42, Andy Dixon wrote:
On 14/02/12 09:04, An
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:43:44AM -0500, douglastskill...@lavabit.com
> wrote:
>> 1 0.00192.168.178.30 127.0.0.1 DNS Standard
>> query A torproject.org
>> 2 0.27192.168.178.30 127.0.0.1 DNS Standard
>> query torproject.org
>> 3 0.000
Brandon,
Use the --prefix option of the configure script:
$ ./configure --prefix=/some/local/path
$ make
$ make install
Then make sure /some/local/path is in your PATH:
$ echo 'PATH=/some/local/path:$PATH' >> ~/.profile
$ echo 'export PATH' >> ~/.profile
$ source ~/.prof
Arg, I am not even sure whether glibc is the problem. A minimal sample
application that performs lookups performs just fine.
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:59:34 +0100
Xu yourdad wrote:
> I have recently watched a video of a conference where Tor developers
> discuss the arms race engaged between them and various governments to
> shut down access to the Tor network.
>
> I have come out with the outline of a design to a mid term
> Arg, I am not even sure whether glibc is the problem. A minimal sample
> application that performs lookups performs just fine.
>
[...]
Here are two strace logs, one with a working lookup and one with a failed
one.___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lis
Hello, I just finished writing some instructions on how to set up an obfsproxy
bridge on torcloud images.
http://pastebin.com/xCA9LmQt
It's largely based on
https://www.torproject.org/projects/obfsproxy-instructions.html.en
but differs mainly on two points :
1) the way to fetch .deb files ne
On 2012-02-14, douglastskill...@lavabit.com
wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am experiencing a strange problem for about two weeks or so.
>
> I am using GNU/Liux (Debian 6 x86-64) and Tor 0.2.2.35 built from source.
> I forward all my tcp traffic and udp traffic on port 53 to my tor instance
> via netfi
>> Arg, I am not even sure whether glibc is the problem. A minimal sample
>> application that performs lookups performs just fine.
>>
> [...]
>
> Here are two strace logs, one with a working lookup and one with a failed
> one.
Oops, forgot the links:
success: http://pastebin.com/waa4fgPG
fail: h
> On 2012-02-14, douglastskill...@lavabit.com
> wrote:
>> Hello List,
>>
>> I am experiencing a strange problem for about two weeks or so.
>>
>> I am using GNU/Liux (Debian 6 x86-64) and Tor 0.2.2.35 built from
>> source.
>> I forward all my tcp traffic and udp traffic on port 53 to my tor
>> inst
Hi Andrew,
I have read those 2 links. The design I'm thinking of would be resistant to
probing attacks presented in the "ten ways to discover bridges" article in
that it would modify the bridge protocol to be "semi" public. The basic
idea is to perform hand shaking between the bridge and the clien
I've started working with some students at University College London to
help them figure out usable security, privacy, and tor. We need some
volunteers willing to be interviewed via phone/skype/gchat by the
students.
Preferably, you self-identify as either an activist or a non-activist
normal per
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 05:34:55PM -0500, douglastskill...@lavabit.com wrote:
> Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
> target prot opt source destination
> MASQUERADE tcp -- 192.168.179.0/24!192.168.179.0/24masq ports:
> 1024-65535
> MASQUERADE udp -- 192.168.179.0/24
Sorry for my delayed response. I got a little behind in my email.
Mr Dash Four wrote:
Scroogle is currently having trouble scraping Google. Maybe Dash Fours
problems with it are unrelated to Tor?
Nope. I am well aware of this and it isn't an issue which just popped
yesterday or a week ago
22 matches
Mail list logo
