"Runa A. Sandvik":
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:42 PM, wrote:
> > This notice- "There is a security update available for the Tor
> > Browser Bundle" appears after a installing Tor 0.2.2.39
> >
> > Is this a cause for concern?
>
> I've noticed the same thing. The notice disappears if you extract
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Katya Titov wrote:
> "Runa A. Sandvik":
>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:42 PM, wrote:
>> > This notice- "There is a security update available for the Tor
>> > Browser Bundle" appears after a installing Tor 0.2.2.39
>> >
>> > Is this a cause for concern?
>>
>> I'v
"Runa A. Sandvik":
>> o Any reason why there was no testing via tor-qa?
>
> Tor 0.2.2.39 was a security-fix release for a fairly severe bug and we
> wanted to get a new release out as soon as possible.
OK, understood.
>> o Any reason why the release wasn't sent to tor-talk?
>
> We announce new
rend-spec...
"permanent-id" is the permanent identifier of the hidden service,
consisting of 80 bits. It can be calculated by computing the hash value
of the public hidden service key and truncating after the first 80 bits:
permanent-id = H(public-key)[:10]
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/to
On 9/15/12, grarpamp wrote:
> openssl rsa -in private_key -pubout -outform DER | sha1 | cut -c 1-10
> python -c "import base64, sys; print
> base64.b32encode(sys.stdin.readline().rstrip('\n')).lower()"
> gu4dsm3cmi3dkyzw
>
> What am I doing wrong besides being sleepy?
You're using the first quar
I have noticed in recent months a change in the behavior of the exit
relay I have set up on my computer.
I often have the bandwidth usage graph visible on my desktop.
In the "Olden Days" the incoming and outgoing traces generally followed
each other pretty closely, but now there are "Bursts" of ou
Hugh, Find the file on your system named "Start Tor Browser.exe".
Right-click it and pick "Send To". From that sub-menu pick "Desktop
(Create Shortcut).
that will, not surprisingly, add a shortcut to your desktop.
Chris, assuming you're using Windows
---
> warms0x:
>> There's a couple of problems with this approach:
>> [...]
>> * The amount of time required to negotiate an HTTP request being
>> proxied
>> from A.onion -> B.onion and then sending a request from B.onion ->
>> A.onion -> Client would very likely brush up against HTTP timeouts
>> (12
On 9/15/12, Robert Ransom wrote:
> On 9/15/12, grarpamp wrote:
>
> > u...p.onion
> >
> > -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> > ...
> > -END RSA PRIVATE KEY-
> >
> > openssl rsa -in private_key -pubout -outform DER | sha1 | cut -c 1-10
> > python -c "import base64, sys; print
> > base64.b32e